this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
30 points (80.0% liked)

Gaming

20021 readers
371 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's say the PC doesn't count and you aren't taking into account backwards compatibility, emulation, online play, homebrew games, and the cost/availability of games.

I feel like I'd want to choose the PS3. Like the Xbox 360 it had a decent lifespan and a lot of games were produced for it. A lot of which are already some of my favorites.

The only things that would make hesitant are I feel like a lot of modern games are larger and have open worlds which I feel like that could be nice in the long run and many of my favorite games for the PS3 have been re-released.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I just consider Steam Deck more PC than console. Even getting games to work requires more tinkering sometimes having to switch proton versions. Console tends to just work in comparison.

I just go by what traditional consoles have been capable of. And only console that comes to mind that even came close to the full functionality of the Steam Deck productivity potential was the PS3 with Linux support before they removed it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Similarly I think people were installing Linux and Steam on their PS4s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

yeah psr could run it if you have an exploited console.

the only console to officially at some point allow for it was the PS3 though.

Alternatively, any xbox one/series is technically capable of running windows in the cloud so you could theoretically get a very expensive cloud pc running on it.