this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37685 readers
282 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm hearing a few mentions about ReactOS recently. What do people mostly use it for? It seems it's trying to be a Windows XP clone, can it run latest browsers, which do not support old Windows versions?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is more of an academic project than anything. It isn't really useful yet and might never be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

It isn't an academic project. Its main problem is that there aren't nearly enough developers or resources to achieve what they want - bug-to-bug compatibility with Windows.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Last time I checked, it could run the latest Firefox, but it might have been the ESR. It's using a lot of the WINE stack so it should be more potent than windows xp. The main issue is drivers, not really application support

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

It's not a project used by anyone for production, or even testing environments. It's mostly just for shits and giggles at this point.

The problem is that there weren't enough developers able to help the project early on, and it's taken so long to make any kind of progress, that the targets they were trying to hit are long, long past. Even if it could be something that could 100% replicate an XP/Server 2003 system, I'm not sure how much utility that would have at this point, at least in a major production environment. Might be good for enthusiasts who still play older games and can't get a hold of an older copy of Windows. But even for production legacy systems, I can't see a business decision where they pick a relatively unknown OS like this to replace an XP stack instead of just modernizing. They might as well just stay on XP. And big enterprises don't choose projects like this for major deployments. They go with the tried and true solutions, regardless of cost or vendor lock-in. It's why "Wintel" has been a thing for 30 years, and why Oracle still exists.

I honestly don't think it will ever be a the drop-in replacement for Windows it aims to be. If it truly got to that point of completion, MS would sue them out of existence. They'd just tie them up in court making them prove it was pure blackbox development until they ran out of money and just folded.