this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
613 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32283 readers
675 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a short copyright period is fair enough to stop corporations putting out word for word copies of your book a week after you publish it. But it doesn't need to be more than 5-10 years, the current death+70 that the USA has pushed on the world is obscene.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any author popular enough to be copied by a corporation is already well supported by fans. People prefer to support artists they like.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not the popular authors that would be getting ripped off, it'd be the small ones. Corps would have people scouting books en masse, find one worth taking without a reputation to back themselves up, then present their own version and crush any momentum you might gain against their millions of dollars in marketing.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

The small ones already dont make money from their work. If theyre undiscovered, they dont have any fans to buy their book. If they are discovered, they have fan support.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you severely underestimate the greed of corporations. If there was no copyright whatsoever there would nothing to stop, for example, amazon not publishing the new novel by a middling author and instead selling their own version where they take all the profit.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didnt disagree with that part. Youre missing the part where theres nothing stopping fans from giving the author money instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By not having their work stolen and published under a different author?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Stolen before its ever been published? I think yall are getting tripped up with thinking corporations can see the future and can steal something that will become successful but has not yet been discovered by any readers. If its successful enough to be stolen, its already successful.