this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
84 points (92.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43907 readers
1120 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the definition I am using:

a system, organization, or society in which people are chosen and moved into positions of success, power, and influence on the basis of their demonstrated abilities and merit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a good idea in theory, but there's a few problems:

  • Wealth and power above a certain level tends to become generational no matter how meritorious the origin
  • People who are less capable through disability, ilness, generational poverty or anything else not their fault would still be left behind
  • A lot of jobs and other functions can benefit from several different skillsets, some of which aren't mutually inclusive
  • Who decides who's best? Who decides who decides? Etc ad infinitum.
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Regarding wealth, it doesn’t have to with a heavy enough estate tax, AKA anti-aristocracy tax.