this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
101 points (86.9% liked)

World News

32087 readers
980 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this all based on Israeli accusations? As we know, Israel can't really be trusted

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But it's confirmed by UN themselves and action are taken on 9 of the 12 individual, with 1 being dead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How did you get to that conclusion? The only "evidence" from the article seems to be

Rockets found under UNRWA crates in Gaza (Photo: IDF)

Weapons hidden in an UNRWA bag, found in Gaza (Photo: IDF)

Was pictures from the IDF the evidence that convinced you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My opinion is based on the article where UN took action on 9 of the 12 individual after their preliminary investigation. Are you saying UN is wrong?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Got it. I just asked about the evidence that convinced you, I'm not even sure how you could make the leap to

Are you saying UN is wrong?

or even what being wrong in this case means.

A lot of people believe IDF claims without a shred of evidence and that's a disservice to the truth, like the 40 beheaded babies thing. The total child casualty count for Oct 7 was 36, including Israeli forces killing at least 2 Israeli children in one encounter.

Wait now I get it, you were being defensive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

No i don't get it lol. You asked i answered and you get oddly upset about my opinion, now i'm being called defensive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

This person was just thing to answer your question. I think you read too much into it philosophically /: