Technology

37739 readers

577 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Only 150+ apps have been designed specifically for Apple's Vision Pro, so far | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I left the headline like the original, but I see this as a massive win for Apple. The device is ridiculously expensive, isn't even on sale yet and already has 150 apps specifically designed for that.

If Google did this, it wouldn't even get 150 dedicated apps even years after launch (and the guaranteed demise of it) and even if it was something super cheap like being made of fucking cardboard.

This is something that as an Android user I envy a lot from the Apple ecosystem.

Apple: this is a new feature => devs implement them in their apps the very next day even if it launches officially in 6 months.

Google: this is a new feature => devs ignore it, apps start to support it after 5-6 Android versions

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

As much as I enjoy hating on Apple, their track record popularising niche technology is admittedly pretty good. They made mp3 players mainstream, then everyone else scrambled to catch up. They made smartphones mainstream, then everyone scrambled to catch up. I wouldn't be surprised if they managed to pull off the same thing with VR/AR. Just don't mention the Newton.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

The Newton was before its time. So many features we use our phones for today were pioneered in the PDA era.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But when was the last time they did it without Jobs?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The AirPods released on 2016 basically kickstarted tws popularity.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They also removed the headphone jack from the phone, so it doesn't really count. Airpods followed the Sony approach: telling your captive audience they will buy the thing or suffer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Why doesn't it count? GP asked for an example where post-Job Apple made something mainstream, and the AirPod basically made TWS earbuds and removing jack mainstream (while not necessarily benefits end users). There are gazillion TWS earbuds now ranging from $2 AliExpress special to $400 from audiophile brands, that should count as mainstream.

Whether Apple can make VR headset mainstream or not, that remains to be seen.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because it relying entirely on the dominance of the iPhone isn't really a post-Jobs action. It's actually the exact opposite: relying entirely on something he captained in order to make sales.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

By this definition, everything that Apple do will count as relying on the dominance of the iphones because how tight their integration between their products is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

The dongle really isn't that bad for people that want the wired experience, but most people don't care.