Asklemmy

43896 readers

1067 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How can the two superpowers cultivate friendly relations / avoid escalating a cold war? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, OP doesn't mention who the 2 superpowers are. Leaves us to draw our own conclusions as to who they are, and currently only one nation has any real ability to project power wherever they need it. So, other than the USA, who is a superpower?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's pretty clear that US doesn't have any real ability to project power wherever they need it. US is very clearly overstretched in Ukraine and the Middle East already, and it's only going to get worse from here. US lacks the industrial base needed for high intensity conflicts, and existing stocks of essential things like artillery shells have been depleted over the past two years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Then we don't actually have any superpowers. Because if the US isn't one, none of the other countries who think they are, would even come close.

Edit: about the artillery shells, we don’t know how many they actually have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

China is the biggest trading partner for the majority of the world, and it's an industrial juggernaut. That's what an actual superpower looks like. Meanwhile, we know that US has been running around pulling artillery shells from South Korea and Israel last year, and that the entire US production capacity for shells is far below the rate of fire in Ukraine. These are basic facts openly acknowledged by US officials. If US can't even produce basic shit like artillery shells, it's not capable of engaging in any serious conflict.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And their nuke aresnal was found to have water in the fuel tanks.

Not a superpower move.

Edit: I forgot ask lemmy was on .ml and people kinda have rose tint glasses when they view authoritarian regimes on this instance.