this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
293 points (81.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20742 readers
295 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The biggest feature of Wayland for me is mixed refreshrate monitors works OOB. On X this is a pain to get even remotely working and it's impossible if your monitors aren't dividable (120/60 works, 144/60 stutters).

This is from my experience something that is starting to be a way more common issue (high refreshrate laptops with 60 external monitors at businesses or high refreshrate monitor for gaming and a smaller secondary monitor for info lookup/discord).

other than that, Xorg does win the "more stable" prize for me, but if I wanted stability, I should've become a carpenter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The biggest feature of Wayland for me is mixed refreshrate monitors works OOB. On X this is a pain to get even remotely working

Literally just plug the monitor and it works. Is this what Wayland people consider hard? No wonder they won't implement anything remotely complex in their protocol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Mixed refresh rates do not work because X technically is not doing multi monitor. Both monitors are rendered from the same "screen" that uses one refresh rate. If it's running at 144hz, the 60 fps screen gets frame pacing issues. If it runs at 60, then the 144hz monitor is slow and gets frame pacing issues, and from most anecdotes and videos I've seen, it's usually the latter and a pain to fix. If you wanted perfect frame pacing on both, you'd have to have the X11 screen set to 8640hz, which I don't even think can render on modern systems. Wayland, on the other hand, just has multi monitor support built in and actively used. Each display has its own screen and renders at its preferred refresh rate, giving perfect frame rates and frame times for both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It literally doesn't work on X11 lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Then how am I doing it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's been plug and play for a decade but sure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No it hasn't. You need to do a weird workaround.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, well, not knowing that it can't work or need a workaround, I'll just keep doing it then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

144/60 works fine for me on X. I only had to disable Vsync for the compositor. Games now run at full 144Hz on my main monitor, and the other two are running perfectly fine at 60Hz.

Though I'm still waiting for the day that I can finally make the jump to Wayland when nvidia support improves (or I have enough money for a new AMD GPU).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

If you're using the latest Nvidia drivers, try it out. I heard support improved dramatically with the latest releases.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

"I made that chair. It's stable AF."

😂😂😂