this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
327 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There were four problems with their decision:

  1. They chose the most expensive car to fix, and that it can't be fixed in independent shops. So, a small dent after a parking where everyone else says "well anyway the insurance pays for it" becomes a $3000 expense

  2. They gave those expensive cars in lease to Uber drivers, meaning instead of having $100 of profit a day, they get a tenth of that, plus they get back a car with thousands and thousands of miles. And those drivers when they get a small dent after a parking they say "well anyway the full cover insurance (Hertz) pays for it"

  3. They gave those cars with a new charging infrastructure to people with no experience at all, which is a shock for someone new. A bit of training is required

  4. They purchased those expensive cars at full MSRP which IMHO is insane because any other automaker CEO would have done everything (=steep discounts) in order to sign such a deal

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Point 4 sounds like the CEO got kickbacks.