this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
43 points (63.9% liked)

World News

32323 readers
851 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe drop one to show that Russia still has the capability, then another on a different city to show that Russia can keep dropping bombs for as long as it takes?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Good idea. I've heard that nuking cities is a very effective way of forcing a stubborn enemy nation to surrender.

It's also preferable to a prolonged invasion and conventional bombing campaign, simply in terms of number of casualties. The number of people killed by the two nuclear bombings it would take to force Ukraine to surrender would be significantly smaller than the number of casualties incurred by a drawn out conventional invasion.

Seems like the only moral course of action for Putin to take.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, another hexbear genius that thinks Putin and his cabinet would survive if they dropped a nuke.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a shitty, misleading comparison not worth acknowledging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for your contribution!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for using your alt to downvote me!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sweet of you to think that