this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
174 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43953 readers
831 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Google glasses, I think it's death was mainly because it looks nerdy aside of course the huge privacy concerns. Which honestly don't exist now. Look at twitch streamers streaming everywhere. People installing cameras at their home and connected to the net for the world to see. Now we are going hard with VR/AR even Apple has a product for it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The concerns exist and are bigger than ever. Ask c/privacy about it. You're referencing the fractional percentage of people who elect to be streamers. Irrelevant to the general population.

A decade ago, one of my local dives, never seen a fight break out there.. dude attacked a woman over them. You don't think people are more poor and angry and traumatized now?

https://www.eater.com/2014/2/25/6273629/woman-attacked-for-wearing-google-glass-at-a-bar-in-sf

I'd never hit a woman or condone violence like this. And, fuck invasive undercover surveillance cameras. This technology can stay in a fuckin dumpster.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Fwiw, citing c/privacy on Lemmy is very, very much also referencing a fractional percentage of society.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

I mean, screw the camera. An affordable, non-intrusive heads-up display on glasses, we're still dying to actually make that a thing. There's a few third party solutions that still kind of do what they were doing but it's nowhere near as good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, streamers might a bad example I admit but in terms of general population being privacy centric. I doubt most people don't really care until ofcourse it affects them if we do we would have huge backlash with Amazon Echo, Google assistant those stuff won't take off. Baby cameras, IP cameras installed in their very homes those things are a huge privacy concerns yet they are still here. We have TikTok/ Vine which people voluntarily submit videos. Theres Pokemon GO which prompt people to use their cameras to catch Pokemons. Not knowing if those image captured might be stored and analyze. Smartphone themselves we have no idea if that thing is recording us. I think Google glass failed simply because of its market which were rich and fashion centric did not like it. Compared to it's competition who still seem alive today.

https://www.techradar.com/news/portable-devices/other-devices/google-glass-competitors-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-compare-1207929

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There are people who suddenly go offline completely because they have enough. I guess I should too

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

The privacy concern is even worse than it was for google glass. 10 years ago, you could rest assured that google wasn't processing your video feed in a meaningful way because there was simply no way to meaningfully use it. Now, the stream can be analyzed on your phone using an AI for meaningful results, and that data can easily be sold because user telemetry is worth more now than ever before. People are also faster to dismiss privacy concerns, so it'll be an easier thing to sell to customers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I think it died because of technical problems more than anything. We didn't have batteries good enough back then, and the screen wasn't all that good. It was heavy, it had problems with overheating and it worked for couple of hours tops

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Apple does not have a product. They have a prototype. It is not for sale.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s less than a month away, you know what he means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Apple hasn’t said anything. It’s based on the supply chain. All Apple has said is early 2024 but all analysts predict a launch announcement in the next couple weeks, with actual launch within a month.