this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
162 points (88.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21060 readers
243 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Slightly unrelated but cygwin will run better on windows (its way lighter)

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Better in which way? WSL2 is a VM running ALONGSIDE Windows, not inside. Its performance is basically bare metal. If you have enough RAM, there is no reason to use cygwin instead of WSL2.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

    its complicated please dont blame me for WSL

    [–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    In that case why don't you just run a VM or install bare metal. WSL strips you of control just like Windows itself does.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

    its complicated as i replied to someone else's comment...

    im not a "it just works" user too but its complicated to explain why i use windows for now (but ill switich soon)

    like im totally a FOSS enthusiast but like...

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    AHHHH "Has ptsd flashbacks from having to use Cygwin on a mixed build environment for a popular MMO that's about some kind of war up in the stars.." lol NOT THE CYGDRIVE lol jk but it did take me back ~5 years.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

    i try to understand that...

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Can Cygwin run Linux GUI programs effectively? What about GPU-bound workloads? Would happily switch if the answer to both of those is yes.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    You can run GUI apps but I'm not sure about GPU workloads. Wouldn't bare metal be the best for that?

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Wouldn't bare metal be the best for that?

    Technically yes, but WSL2 is remarkably close to optimal in terms of throughput. Unlike WSL1 (a type 2 hypervisor), WSL2 requires Hyper-V (a type 1 hypervisor), meaning Windows also runs as a VM once it’s enabled. The Linux vGPU driver still needs to go through the Windows Nvidia driver as far as I know, but that is seldom the bottleneck for CUDA applications.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

    true it uses a Microsoft Hypervisor Virtual Machine

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

    i dont mind the GUI... but is Cygwin open source? just knowing

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yep, that's what I use as well... in Windows I mean.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Best option is still Git Bash 🙃

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago