this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
167 points (90.0% liked)

World News

32297 readers
658 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately we proved just before the midterms that there's a very linear inverse correlation between gas prices and perceived job performance. Refilling the strategic petroleum reserve is electorally smart. Until activists can detach these electoral relaities nothing will change for anyone.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (10 children)

That's still a bad reason to increase the speed at which we're killing ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (32 children)

It's a great reason until there's an alternative. As long as voters look to gas prices for their votes, taking action that raises them is politically toxic.

Meanwhile leftists are literally criticizing the Biden administration for high gas prices' impact on the working class.

You want to change it? Let's change it. Starting with activists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile leftists are literally criticizing the Biden administration for high gas prices’ impact on the working class.

Which leftists are these? I’ve yet to run into them.

You want to change it? Let’s change it. Starting with activists.

I still haven’t been able to decipher what kinds of activists you’re alluding to.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Progressive liberals I guess? The Hill, Mar. ’22: Gas prices lead to tensions within Democratic Party

Progressives are concerned that high gas prices are worsening inequalities, creating tension between activists who want Democrats to do more to condemn big oil and those trying to navigate Russia’s deadly invasion of Ukraine.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

not when the opposition would increase the speed even more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Cmon guys you're both pretty, lets accept that were doomed and vote Big Asteroid 2024

Really though vote now for the chance to vote again, not that it fucking matters because we're 40 years late to taking any corrective action, but I'd like to vote again

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So business as usual. We were doomed 20 years ago, when we could have had a fighting chance.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

not exactly business as usual. Biden is doing more than most presidents have. Not enough, but also not nothing. But the fact is not enough will ever be done until public opinion drastically changes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Biden signed off on a record number of new oil projects, it's not business as usual, it's business is accelerating as usual. Environment be dammed

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

there's more to the topic than oil which is a necessary evil for the time being. or would you rather be beholden to OPEC and the Middle East?

but sure, let's go ahead and ignore everything else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Right. Kill ourselves slowly.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Until activists can detach these electoral relaities

Which form of jargon is this and what does it mean in English? Is this polisci-speak of some sort? Who is an “activist” in this context, and what would they be detaching from what, and how?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

clearly they mean environmental activists. and the "detachment" is accepting that low gas prices is key to getting elected over a republican who would be even worse than Biden for the environment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Weird how the only viable electoral strategy is indistinguishable from the status quo of making the rich richer at the expense of the poor.