this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
219 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
4107 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

China’s Nuclear-Powered Containership: A Fluke Or The Future Of Shipping?::Since China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) unveiled its KUN-24AP containership at the Marintec China Expo in Shanghai in early December of 2023, the internet has been abuzz about it. Not jus…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 69 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Nuclear powered ships are not a new thing. They've been around for decades. They would benefit our emission a lot. Let's hope that they will be allowed in the ports around the world, this has been the greatest limitation so far. Convincing general population that nuclear can be safe is no easy feat.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (6 children)

They're not a new idea, but the problem is that actually taking one into a port is a regulatory nightmare. Most jurisdictions have very, very strict rules around the handling of nuclear materials and would rather just say "Fuck off" than even contemplate the nightmare of getting something like into their waters with all of the proper tests and inspections completed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is what killed nuclear cargo ships in the past. Ports just don't want such things coming in all the time.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

We are burning and drowning so I hope here is enough of a desire to make it happen this time.

Militaries have a stellar record of not melting down their ships (fact check me someone I havent looked this up) with barely trained 18 year olds, so until we have a renewable energy storage that can power a cargo vessel around the world without taking up too much mass, this might be the best option.

I hear sails are coming back too though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hear sails are coming back too though.

It's streaming companies' fault

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thresher.

Here's more if you want. I'm not against nuclear power but it's maritime use is far more dangerous than power generation on land.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Here's the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

This article lists notable military accidents involving nuclear material. Civilian accidents are listed at List of civilian nuclear accidents. For a general discussion of both civilian and military accidents, see nuclear and radiation accidents. For other lists, see Lists of nuclear disasters and radioactive incidents.

^article^ ^|^ ^about^

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)