this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
163 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37707 readers
167 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought this was The Onion at first.

But Musk is doing a great job of achieving his goal of killing Twitter. I wonder who paid or blackmailed him enough for it to be worth the 44 billion?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were one of the largest investors in Twitter before the purchase. Musk said he would buy it, then tried to back out, and his hand was forced

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how would they threaten him? What’s leverage could they have against someone on the other side of the world who has the means to protect himself by paying security etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elon Musk takes the socialization out of social networks! What an innovation!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It was like this on the Flamingo app aswell and I prefered it that way. I almost never interact with any tweets so those buttons were just useless clutter for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (29 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think "Who is still using them?" is a better question.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty soon, no one, quite literally

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Wtf kind of comment is this supposed to be?

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›