this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
729 points (95.8% liked)

solarpunk memes

3839 readers
853 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

I could go on vacation twice a year if I didn't pay rent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

If a person disappears the things they own will still be here, shocking revelation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 hours ago

point is that they add no value to anything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

When workers die, you no longer have labor. When scientists die you no longer have their intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

Found the landlord, guys

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Maybe the true communism is just killing whoever we don't like and taking their stuff all along. /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Where is your horse in the race? Is it really "yours" if all you do is collect a premium for having a piece of paper that says so while someone else does all the care, training, and maintenance for it? What a raw deal for that person...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

it's better to use the gender neutral term, more inclusive, please use landparasite

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

I'm no sexist. They can also evaporate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

All y'all need to read about Georgism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Geo-orgyism? I'm in.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Yeah Henry George is a true American treasure. I've been a Georgist for about 17 years now. Seems like the movement is finally gaining a little bit of momentum. Or at least people are talking about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Done. I see the cat.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (34 children)

We'd have a lot of empty houses and maybe cheaper houses.

Look. Personally, I love renting. Its fleksible.i can move whenever i want to and not think about selling. Also i can live in places where houses are practically unsellable and not worry that I can't sell once I want to live somewhere else

Also, I don't have to worry about repairing and maintaining the house. If I window breaks, I call the landlord. If a pipe breaks a leak, I call the landlord. For me, renting is great!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

If I window breaks, I call the landlord. If a pipe breaks a leak, I call the landlord. For me, renting is great!

Here I'm responsible for all that. Renting is not so great... lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Buying and selling houses is a nightmare to make you feel like rentals are necessary.

When my parents wanted to move as young adults it was easy for them to sell their property and use that money to buy a new one in the place they were moving to. That's now way more difficult just for the benefit of landlords.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

When I was four (in 1986), my parents moved for my Dad's job (he was transferred), and ended up accepting the company offer to buy their house at not a great price because they couldn't find a market buyer. At least from my experience, buying and selling forty years ago was just as fraught as now.

Do you have examples of specific practices that have become common and make house sales more difficult?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Housing should not be a speculative asset in the first place. Houses are for living in- and before you tell me about how they are a valuable store of wealth, you shouldn't need to do that either to get by. Your net worth and therefore your class standing should not be a factor in whether you can have access to the basics of life. That's why it's called capital-ism, because everything revolves around capital. It's designed to self-perpetuate by exploiting the inequalities it produces. There are other ways of life, and they aren't as pie-in-the-sky as they would seem. You just have to get out of the capitalist frame of mind to understand how they work and what exactly is holding us back from achieving them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I think the biggest issue is that the price of homes proportional to income isn't what it used to be. And that causes things to keep getting worse.

Homes cost more and people have less money so less homes are sold. This allows institutional investors to buy up larger portions of the available housing, and they prefer to rent those out.

So that along with other factors makes home prices keep going up causing less people to be able to buy. People being forced to pay a larger portion of their income to housing causes the spiral to get worse and creeps into other industries that people won't patronize if they need to save money.

Landlordss being allowed free reign historically does this to countries. It happend in England and China and probably a lot more countries i am ignorant about.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'd be happy to rent if the value of houses didn't double every decade.

Here in Australia you really just work so you can pay your mortgage. The wealth you accrue through your life is mostly the value of your house rather than the money you save.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

you really just work so you can pay your mortgage.

Of course. Why would we work so hard to keep jobs that most of us hate if we didn't have mortgages and rent to pay? This is how the machine keeps itself turning. If only there was a motor that wasn't so exploitative in nature...

[–] [email protected] 43 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

@cosmicrookie @stabby_cicada you could still have rental houses in a system with no landlords

[–] [email protected] 34 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

@cosmicrookie @stabby_cicada I mean for example with housing cooperatives

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Okay, but then you still do need to worry about eating the loss of property with little to no value remaining. The Cooperative is a group of people living there and owning the homes via very large loans which do not disappear when you no longer wish to live there. Depending on the co-ops terms you might get straddled with debt even if you leave. In the worst case, if you're the last one out and the debt does transfer to remaining owners then you get stuck with many tens of thousands of dollars debt.

In examples like China, where they executed landlords en masse to forcefully redistribute land, ended up just falling back on the landlord property rental structure exactly the same as before.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago

Just imagine paying the half of it, for supporting local workers for maintenance and fixups instead of a random nobleman's holidays in paradise...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Have you seen what that looks like in the US? It ain’t pretty or comfortable.

That’s like buying something that’s “military grade” thinking it’s good. It’s not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah lol why would anybody pay inflated prices for a house if government housing was just as good. It's not the government that's your problem, it's the owning class that makes the rules with a vested interest in making sure a) public resources don't compete with private profit and b) workers have to keep working to survive (which also generates private profit)

Look at the public housing in singapore. Shit's awesome. You're telling me the wealthiest nation on the planet can't pull that off? I call bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I grew up in a government subsidized co-op, and I loved it. It's still going, and some of the rents are as low as $8/mo.

Government/public housing can be good. You just need to protect it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I already was born unlucky enough to not be rich. What are the chances of being lucky enough to get one of those subsidized co-op homes?

Where I live, affordable housing is distributed on a lottery system. So I mean literally, what are the chances one has to obtain such housing? I can't imagine there are enough homes for every applicant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

The earlier you apply the better your chances. Just call up your city and enquire about applying. If you qualify, they might get back to you next year, or in five years. But they'll definitely never get back to you if your name isn't on the list. Anyway, people move out all the time -- when their luck turns and they decide they want a house, or need to move for work. My parents moved out.

My parents were on the list for less than a year before we got in. We were poor as fuck. I'm talking trip to the steel dump for my birthday kind of poor. So your luck can turn around if you try sometimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›