this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
986 points (94.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

7272 readers
3356 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (49 children)

"I judge art on the basis of how it was made, not on its merit in terms of the emotions and thoughts it elicits from me"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How not to define art

(You can take this as agreeing or disagreeing with you, or both)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Tbh, this is a valid take, but it's just as valid to judge art based on the experience of viewing it.

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
  1. There is no "AI".
  2. There's nothing inherently wrong or bad with generated art. The assumption that generated art is "slop" is literally the inverted assumption that "AI" will save us. But in reality there's lots of cool pictures and many cool videos that were generated.
  3. If you're mad about copyright/exploitation, the actual problem has always been capitalism.
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (23 children)

Depends on the artist. Shitty at drawing but got skills on the comp? Ill take the art you used AI for.

Plenty of AI slop out there sure, but there is also plenty of drawn/painted/sculpted/whatever slop out there as well.

Hating on new tools is some dumb shit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Not referring to the Adobe model that compensates artists in the training set, but besides them there has been great debate on the ethics of ingesting & regurgitating. (“but small humans do it” etc)

Which is to say of course it could be the best art in the world and it wouldn’t be beautiful in those eyes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hating on new tools is some dumb shit.

The algorithms are beautiful, revolutionary, a true achievement of humanity.

The way the corporations have used those algorithms is unethical, inartistic, a true embarrassment of humanity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The way the corporations have used...

This is true of everything under capitalism. And it doesn't mean the art is slop.

For example our phones are made by slave labor but nobody is posting memes about how all phones are slop. Maybe they should do. It would be a better cause than crying about generated art.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Sharing AI art has the same vibe as telling people about your dreams.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›