this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
809 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

45629 readers
1165 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a grain of truth in here, but not quite. One in every four or so (not quite, but we can roll with it regardless) identified species of animal is a beetle. Not one in every four animals, by population nor overall species.

The reasons for this is are many, but may include because beetles are big, easy to catch, agriculturally-significant, and are particularly easy to pin and study, dramatically boosting the count of beetle species we work with on an academic level (lending to higher identification rates). There are also just a shitload of beetle species, naturally.

Scientists estimate something closer to ~10 million species of animals, which would still make beetles a huge percentage of the species, but a far cry from 25%. If you looked at the total number (estimated) of individual animals, beetles are pretty insignificant.

Source: Studied entomology and love me some Coleoptera

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what a beetle would say

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I have a tamagotchi, my gf and my dog!

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope I'm Ringo Star, he was always my favourite.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By namesake, my child should be a Beatle. Not sure if this means I am or that I have to marry a beetle to genetically make that happen. The whole question feels incestuous.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

The biomass of all living ants is greater than the biomass of every living human.

As long as we don't count your mom.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What if all my friends are beetles?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd do the math to calculate the number of negative beetles you are, but I don't actually care that much

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

3 + X = 1
X = -2

Yeah that took me a bit to come up with, and it feels wrong for some reason, but I can't place it and it seems to check out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Them for every 4 friends, 3 are fake beetles

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, so 1 friend is a bat, one is a beetle, what are the other 2 friends? Don't leave us hanging like that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don’t leave us hanging

Found the bat.

One of them is probably a plankton, by the way. 95% of all marine life is plankton.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Juice yourself

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gregor Samsa time whoop whoop

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Have you awoken one morning from unsettling dreams and found yourself changed into a monstrous vermin in your bed? Then this tweet is for you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Welcome to the wonderful world of statistics, shit can look pretty fucky sometimes

Edit: Basically this is a question of distribution in regards to statistics. Ie: statistically speaking you're almost completely hydrogen because our universe is almost completely hydrogen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

For every different type of beetle there is, and the 1800s tell us there are a great many, there exists a species of parasitic wasp that uniquely targets that beetle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Knowing my luck I'd be the Stuart Sutcliffe or Pete Best.