this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
434 points (99.1% liked)

politics

21775 readers
3742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The situation invokes a thought of 'Inglourious Basterds'

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 8 hours ago

good. none of these people should be able to go anywhere in public without being booed. Typical conversations should be: Hey your one of the assholes fucking everything up.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 hours ago

I too would also boo the person who took a gigantic shit in the middle of the stage. Fuck that guy.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

There's no more woke in this country

I'm still waiting on their written definition of woke. They will never provide one though. "Woke" is their "shmoo".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

Apparently the woke was what was keeping the planes functioning

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 hours ago

The real definition: being aware of systemic discrimination, oppression, and persecution.

The Republican definition: everything that doesn't comport with the values of 1920s-1940s European fascism and 1840s American labor and racial laws.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Unfortunately, in their world it works perfectly, because of "systemic oppression of white christian family values".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve just started calling things I don’t like “woke.”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

These potatos are woke, not enough salt

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Woke is anything they don't like. If they have to describe it, it's minorities and women having equal opportunities. Saying woke makes them sound like less of an asshole to people not willing to go beyond surface level conversations.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's civil rights.

From Britannica:

Civil rights are an essential component of democracy. They’re guarantees of equal social opportunities and protection under the law, regardless of race, religion, or other characteristics. Examples are the rights to vote, to a fair trial, to government services, and to a public education. In contrast to civil liberties, which are freedoms secured by placing restraints on government, civil rights are secured by positive government action, often in the form of legislation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

Woke is anyone who isn't them. Which makes the the sleepy weepies.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 hours ago

Yes, they ARE intolerant ... to facism and stifling creativity.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Audience members had undergone a full Secret Service security check as Vance’s motorcade drew up at the US’s national performing arts centre, delaying the start of the concert by 25 minutes.

After news of the reaction to Vance at the concert emerged, Richard Grenell, interim director of the Kennedy Center who was recently appointed by Trump, said the crowd was “intolerant”.

In February, Donald Trump sacked the chairman of the Kennedy Center board along with 13 of its trustees, appointing himself the new chair, bringing in foreign policy adviser and close ally Richard Grenell as interim leader, and naming new board members (...)

“So we took over the Kennedy Center,” the president said at the time. “We didn’t like what they were showing and various other things. We’re going to make sure that it’s good and it’s not going to be woke. There’s no more woke in this country.”

Who ruined this place, JD?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Who ruined this place, JD?

those weird stains on the seats suggest he was desperate. The couches probably started seeing someone else. maybe a futon. once you go futon, you don't go back.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago

"I did not have sectional relations with that ottoman!"

[–] [email protected] 71 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Thursday evening’s concert programme – Shostakovich’s second violin concerto, with Leonidas Kavakos the soloist, followed by Stravinsky’s Petrushka – got off to a slightly shaky start before settling into its stride.

Audience members nervously joked during the intermission about the apposite all-Russian programme, given Vance’s brutal dressing-down of the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, during an Oval Office blowup in February that played directly into the hands of the Russian ruler, Vladimir Putin.

If this was a movie I'd complain about the stupid "coincidences" that happen for the sake of the plot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

Aww I love Shostakovich. He almost died under Stalin, but decided to play along afterwards. Still, anyone who doesn't understand that his music was deeply critical of the system - well, doesn't understand his music.

load more comments
view more: next ›