World News

32699 readers

1319 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Accidents, not Russian sabotage, behind undersea cable damage, officials say (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://archive.ph/7JcKG

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Now watch the majority of the news outlets who published the sabotage accusation not mention this at all.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

First it was NS2, now the cables. I wonder if they'll admit the claims of Russian EM weapons--so-called Havana syndrome--are likewise groundless.

[+] [email protected] -8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Just like many Russian accidents, those undersea cables just fell out of windows.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

Sorry, are you implying that, out of all media, WaPo is spreading Russian propaganda?!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

BlueAnon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wonder why Bezos' media channel, aligned with Trump, aligned with etc. is the only source on this..

Meanwhile the investigators in question deny this because of course they deny and we can't trust those either.

Lol the article even has community notes

The comments overwhelmingly express skepticism about the conclusion that undersea cable damage was caused by maritime accidents rather than Russian sabotage. Many commenters argue that it is implausible for ships to accidentally drag anchors for long distances without noticing, suggesting intentional actions instead. There is a strong sentiment that the article's headline misrepresents the content, with accusations of spreading misinformation and downplaying potential Russian involvement.