Yeah I've experienced it too and switched to startpage.

DuckDuckGo is just a bing proxy. I think Microsoft is working on optimizing it for their copilot thing.

duck duck go is showes Bing results. maybe Microsoft is doing somthing.

In general, I noticed that a significant degradation of search engines began to occur after the appearance of chatGPT, perhaps this is somehow related. Before that, degradation was slower. Maybe in Google for example they were a little afraid that ChatGPT would learn from their search engines and replace them...

I also noticed redoing a search sometimes yields different results despite using the exact same keywords.

Which search engine is good to find pirate sites and other general websites

I'd say their search results have been in decline for some time now, though quality has taken a particularly big hit the past year or so. I'd switch to someone else, but I haven't found a decent alternative yet. As poor as DDG's results are, they are still a few rungs above the rubbish Google spits out.

DDG's results have always been bad in my experience. Unless I'm searching for the most basic, general stuff, more often than not I find more irrelevant results than relevant ones (if I find any relevant ones at all.)

Not to say that Google is much better. I've noticed a steady decline in relevance over the past 15 years.

These days if I want an actual answer to something, I still have to add site:reddit.com to my queries. That or ask an AI and hope it's not hallucinating some bullshit. It may be full of shit, but at least AI understands what I'm looking for.

I also noticed a change. From one day to the next I suddenly got lots of reddit links in the top results

TIL DDG is bing and it's like being diagnosed with cancer.

Yes, DDG results have seen a major drop in quality in the past 4-6 months. It's been my primary search engine for several years now but I don't know if my loyalty can withstand such a drastic decline. Bing results must have taken a nosedive as well, but I don't use Bing so I can't compare.

In my experience, Google has been to me a better tool to find pirate sites but I got poor results about programming topics there, otherwise, with DuckDuckGo I got excellent results for programming topics but poorly results for pirate sites.

I've always had a hard time switching from Google to any other search engine because the gap on quality. But since last year, Google's results are getting worse and worse but on the other hand I have found DDG to be quite satisfying. So maybe their results have changed, but for me it was for the better.

websearch enshittification hits me extra hard because I was always bad at searching. please keep me in your thoughts.

Yes they have. I typically use it to find pages I go to on a regular basis without 'bookmarking'. Used to find them as a first result so much that all I had to do was let the search load and hit the top link. No more. Now there are anywhere between 2 to 5 links above mine on load only passively related.

feels censored to me. i wouldn't be surprised if u had poor results for torrenting websites.

https://udm14.org/

Are there any search engine aggregators which can pull the top X sites from multiple locations and display them on a single page?

Because it's just bing under the hood, same as qwant. And Bing/microshaft doesn't really care that much about you using it for actual search. M$hit wants you to use Copilot. Copilot cannot be fit as easily into meta search engines such as SearxNG. I'm quite convinced that the whole push behind the aggressive AI promotion going hand in hand with search engine experience degradation (ACCELERATED BY THE PROLIFERATION OF SEOMAXXING AI-SLOP ONLINE) is to a large extent driven by the desire to tighten the walled gardens and information control. Millions of idiots convinced that a text generator program is somehow similar to an actual person would more readily accept it providing opinions or censored information, in place of diverse information.

Congratulations to all of you still happily trading your freedom for convenience. Instead of just a ranking algorithm that nonetheless can show you multiple results at a glance, you get the generation of just one result, at the environmental cost much higher than a regular search, up to 10 times more energy, and sometimes even slower than what would be the time required to load a regular page on a good LTE connection if modern web wasn't so bloated.

All while accelerating the march towards digital feudalism. Because even the immense amount of storage space and link capacity required to build your own search index is nothing compared to the cost of training a LLM and then providing it via some SaaSS.

Yep, use to recommend it but it's just got generic even when filters are set to off, also the ai shit is annoying tho I respect them for not shoving it down my throat. I guess I'll just wait for ladybug search engine to drop. PS: if anyone's looking to compile I'll save you the trouble cause for now it's only a webview in an app. You could go to DDG or google to search but it's not a nice experience

I only use searx for this reason. Also, whyre you searching for pirate sites? You should have a handful that you use and seed for.