this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
873 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Billionaires like Marc Andreessen, Elon Musk, and Vivek Ramaswamy are spreading false claims to discredit the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a federal agency protecting consumers from fraud and abuse.

Andreessen falsely accused the CFPB of politically motivated “debanking,” despite no evidence.

This rhetoric aligns with the “DOGE” project, led by Musk and Ramaswamy, which aims to slash government regulations and programs under the guise of efficiency.

Critics warn this effort will harm public services, benefit billionaires, and push privatization at the expense of ordinary Americans.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 122 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like how the only "increases" in efficiency they have proposed are to completely eliminate programs instead of actually making any of them better. Maybe we should adopt this same methodology to "solve" the problem of billionaires. 🤷

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well the economy would be more efficient without the capitalist class, although I get the feeling DOGE isn't going to reccomend we switch to a Syndicalist economy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I'm hoping for more of a "let them eat cake" kind of moment.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Remember kids, they want the government gone because they want to become the government to enrich themselves.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

More accurately they want to become the oligarchy. Like in Russia.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think this is partly why they got the stupid gomers thinking that Russia is some fantasy zone for white right wing xtian nationalists. For the oligarchs, Russia's set up is a dream, so they have to find stupid voters to vote against their own economic interests for backwards identity politics reasons...so they make Putin out to be sympathetic towards xtians and homophobia and "whiteness" for the benefit of the rubes in the U.S.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For the oligarchs, Russia’s set up is a dream

Until they get defenestrated

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Putin's been in power for like 20 years, and despite putting the Russian people through hell these last two years and an actual coup attempt he's still going strong. Arguably you could say things didn't really change much even after Joseph Stalin died in 1953, aside from secession of several nations outside of central Russia, that it's all just one big continuation of the same system.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

But wait, President Musk is the edge lord Id like to be, he’s also a genius, he wouldn’t lie.

/s

[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no, what will we do if billionaires control the U.S. government.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1893 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907

And those are just J.P. Morgan.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is your point that this is fear mongering, or that the struggle between classes has been an ongoing fight for most of recorded history?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The latter. I mean, America was founded by a tobacco company and people so weird in their religiosity, they were kicked out of 17th century Europe.

I do think we can solve the oligarch problem. So, part of me was like, “We’ve met this challenge before, motherfuckers.” It wasn’t meant to dismissive but I’m pretty sure I could open hand slap Elon Musk and 24 of his 38 kids would feel it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wish I had your optimism. Hand it over.

On a more serious note, I truly believe that enriching & modernizing our education system is the way to go for dethroning our billionaire overlords. We can't just expect slap dash imploding submarines to do all the work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All billionaires must go by any means necessary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Americans will not destroy the military or the police state. We need those to do harm against our enemies and to punish the undeserving.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't understand. You make them non-functional through incompetency first, then change their purpose and voila...neither.

Then you pay Elon Musk for fleets of Tesla robots that don't work to do your dirty work 🤣

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

From what I've seen under Eric Adams in New York, you never actually lay any of these people off. You just bring in a robot that bumbles around a subway terminal until it breaks down, while a squad of officers guard it with lethal force.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Nothing new.

Americans are easy marks. Not most of our faults, we're poorly educated by design. Critical thinking is college level here.

Few of us have any interest in being a society, any snake oil con man has to do is tell us we'll be rich!.. Just fuck over our fellow humans first, lol, and we'll come a running to that ballot box to literally destroy the very safetynet under our own feet. It's quite pathetic to witness.

Then we'll spend decades kneeling in front of them waiting for golden showers of prosperity, when we're not at one another's throats out of the zero sum mindset this herp derp land of rugged individualism propagates.

Our hyper individualist, disdain for the very concept of society is gallows hilarious. It's like bragging that we're conditioned to let one another drown. Yay? Got to hand it to the marketers on that one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I agree with you. Quite a lot. And yet.. Rugged individualism can also make a person want to think for themselves and not herp derp with the uneducated masses. I'm just saying American individualism can, uh, in certain cases make one more prone to collectivism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I am the result of that type of backfiring, got fed right wing propaganda about rugged individualism and the founders as a kid. Turns out that that can backfire heavily into making someone who wants to be left alone, wants to tar and feather people, and thinks some type of collectivism is the best way towards that.

Fun fact, my grandmother finds my politics annoying which makes sense given the fact she fed me the propaganda but doesnt generally argue my points since I have pointed out that she is the fucking base source of them. She copes and thinks its cause of school and not the fact that she held up violent revolutionaries and our bastard ancestors up on pedestals.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago

Rich people are like other rich people, more than they are like their fellow countrymen, or ethnic group, or religious group. Anything a billionaire says is good for "everyone" needs to be understood in that light: the "everyone" they see are "all the people I associate with", meaning "other rich people".

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All you have to do is convince the ignorant, unwashed masses that you're speaking for them, not about them, and they will let you have whatever you want.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People don't want policies. They don't even want demagogues. They want a set of jingling keys in front of their face. That's what they'll pay attention to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

But wait, they’re all wearing Tshirts instead of suits on these podcasts. Are you saying that doesn’t mean they’re one of us?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

And the Tankies and Anarchists both are cheering them on despite bullshitting to themselves that they're opposed to the Billionaires.

A planet overfull of people in the Age of Information and we've got Billions of fucking Rubes.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Gaurenteeing that's exactly what we will do. Hopefully i be mostly dead.

load more comments
view more: next ›