this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
330 points (98.5% liked)

News

23664 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk, co-leading Trump’s “Department of Government Efficiency,” could influence U.S. broadband funding to benefit Starlink, his satellite internet company.

The Biden administration’s $42.45 billion BEAD program prioritizes fiber optics for rural broadband, but Starlink has been excluded for failing to meet performance standards.

Musk has criticized the program as wasteful and could push for funding delays or reallocation, benefiting Starlink as the only option in underserved areas.

Critics warn this shift favors Musk’s financial interests over reliable fiber infrastructure, raising conflict-of-interest concerns.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 114 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Jackiechan-what.jxl

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Seriously. Is anybody surprised by these headlines?

[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What a weird way to spell “will” I mean they missed every letter, “could” some editor must be real embarrassed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

It's just their way of writing on something while avoiding a libel case against them.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago

Wadya mean 'could'?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

he literally invested 44 billion for this

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

One might wonder where the 44 billion came from in the first place.

Oh...

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago

No shit sherlock.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

He’s been grifting taxpayers forever. His improved access just allows him to expand it. America sucks.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago

Well of course. As that was always the plan.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Change the “could” in the title to “will” for better accuracy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

You could even go as far as changing the "will" to "is", looking at how much Tesla's stock recently gained due to the forward looking nature of the market.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what is with this trend of journalists slowly meandering to the point, tripping over themselves every step of the way?

musks’s conflict of interest has been staring us in the face since the DGE was first announced. (im not going to include the “of” in the acronym)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They get paid by the word.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

if the article is long enough you could do a mid article ad as well

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What else would he possibly use it for?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Other-people-enpoorment?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

Bears could shit in the woods.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

Noooo... really?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He wouldn’t do that though because he already has so much money.

He doesn’t need anymore…… right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

This just in, politicians can use their power for self-enrichment.

The people who this might be news to are already so disillusioned.

As an aside, I don't think the new department will actually do anything, it'll just find projects with weird goals and claim they can save us all $100 million. Wow, big money. The Pentagon has failed literally every audit with billions unaccounted for with no repercussions, every single year since we even started checking in 2017. This is not "well it's classified so they can't tell us", this is the Pentagon acknowledging they have ~$4 TRILLION in physical assets and about half are unaccounted for.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"I've investigated and my companies are the most efficient!"

🙄

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

You can bet that on day one he'll claim NASA is less efficient than SpaceX, and therefore their budget should be directed to his company instead.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

That is the plan.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

This just in... Water is wet!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

This is such a stupid headline. No one actually thinks it's anything else.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't that the point?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

He wants to gut the FAA and DoT for daring to regulate his companies

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

could? probably already is

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

"Governments in capitalist society are but committees of the rich to manage the affairs of the capitalist class."

  • James Connolly
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Another insightful deep-cut article from my favorite columnist Captain Obvious

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The acronym for Department of Government Efficiency is DOGE

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Such wow. Much efficiency!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

That would be such an unexpected plot twist! (No)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

*Audible gasp

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Is ‘could’ the new spelling of ‘will’?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

"Would he do that?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. As much as I hate the idea of Musk cutting infrastructure spending for broadband, I think it wouldn't hurt to cut this part. We've had multiple occasions where telecom companies take the money and run while not being held accountable by the government. Does that make him the right person for the job? Absolutely fucking not.

load more comments
view more: next ›