this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
663 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
4831 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A 24-year-old man, Daniel Schmidt, was arrested after allegedly disrupting a voting line and assaulting an election judge in Orland Park, Illinois.

Schmidt reportedly attempted to skip the line, ignored repeated instructions to wait, and punched an election judge who tried to stop him, knocking off their glasses.

Other patrons restrained him until police arrived, at which point Schmidt resisted arrest. He faces multiple charges, including aggravated battery against a person over 60 and resisting arrest.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Why does it makes a difference if the person is over 60? Shouldn't aggravated battery be aggregated battery no matter who the victim is?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

its significant that the assaulter was 24 and the victim is over 60. Now granted he was lucky that pole worker was not my brother or David 'The Rock' Nelson.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A pole worker is something…different. You’re thinking of a poll worker.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Same for an erection judge ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

on hindsight I should have said election judge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because the elderly are a vulnerable population like children.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You never know the health condition of people, hitting someone is hitting someone is hitting someone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s reductive. Give them any definition you like but you have to accept that children and the elderly are different than people aged, say, 18-60.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As I mentioned in another comment you can hit a 30 years old in the chest not knowing they have a heart issue and they will die on the spot, you can hit a 60 years old that works security that will kick your ass. Hitting someone is wrong no matter who it is and should lead to the same consequences no matter who it is, if that means making consequences harsher if the victim is 18 to 59 then so be it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I suspect the main purpose of those laws was to handle the increasing problem of elder abuse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally I'm glad to see that so many states make a distinction (hopefully with harsher consequences) for battery against older people, because of all the stories I've seen this week about magats punching old people. I haven't seen any stories about them punching the ones who would be able to put up a fight, funny how that works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can hit someone 30 in the chest and it turns out they have a health condition and they die of heart failure, you can hit someone 61 that works security that will then kick your ass. In the end hitting people is wrong no matter who gets hit and should come with the same consequence no matter who gets hit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Very smart, he sure showed them. 🤣

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

People are saying the wound-up violent douchecanoe was reportedly overheard saying, "Lineup?! NO! ME first! FIRST!"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›