this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
156 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

34799 readers
217 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Once again ordinary people in the West are saved from affordable, low-pollution living. And Western companies are saved from having to compete.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

That's catchy, but not entirely true.

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general), plus they have cheaper environmental and labour standards... it's not like there's a fair market EU companies can compete in without some sort of handicap.

PS: Yes, "western" countries have been playing along with China's deliberate long term strategy with full awareness of where it would lead, but that's another story that is both much older and has a much broader scope than the EV industry.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general), plus they have cheaper environmental and labour standards… it’s not like there’s a fair market EU companies can compete in without some sort of handicap.

Hah. Volkswagen is in trouble right now because they fucked up the transition to electric cars completly. What do you think will happen now? That's right, we the (German) people will have to save them now, with our money. Basically the same shit as a subsidy, just later in the process. Kinda like what the Chinese do, just the really stupid way.

Oh, and of course, it will be everybody's fault but their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general)

And that's a bad thing? Any sensible government is going to subsidise renewable energy and electric vehicles. It makes both economic and environmental sense. Anyone not doing this is an idiot and a climate terrorist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Can you explain to us what the problem with China subsidizing EV manufacturers is exactly? That's how China chooses to run their economy, and it's entirely their business. The whole argument for capitalist markets is that they're supposed to be more competitive last I checked. If that's not the case then maybe the west should reexamine its assumptions about how an economy should be run.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

It is massively clownish though because as the barrier to entry goes up higher everyone will just switch to micromobility which is built mostly by the Chinese

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

is this the famous "invisible hand of the market"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Is your argument pro market regulation or against market regulation or just there to stir up shit?

The EU is a heavily regulated market economy. Broadly that creates better outcomes and higher levels of happiness for its citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (27 children)

Competition is good! Unless it makes shareholders sad.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (13 children)

I'm so confused here. I was under the impression that the entire argument for capitalist markets was that they produce cheaper and better goods than is possible to do with central state planning. Yet, here we have the capitalist west complaining that Chinese state driven model if producing goods that western companies are simply not able to compete with. Somebody help me understand.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Capitalists hate capitalism. Competition is so irritating, because someone might undercut you. (And other people would cheat to win, just like you would, so you can't ever relax.)

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Politicians be like

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yay, no punishment for the european brands. What they were doing, slept?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Germany is upset about this because they sell cars to China. This will probable create Chinese counter tariffs on European cars.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

because they sell cars to China

For how much longer? Can German cars even still compete with the Chinese, or has that ship sailed already? Come, buy the best engineering of yesteryear! Yay!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Awww what's da madder widdle capitalist can't compete with a state run economy??

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I assume this doesn't apply to Chinese parts used to manufacturer electric cars in the EU

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

@geneva_convenience It's exactly the same that also happened several years ago between the US and the EU concerning civil planes. Here Boeing and Airbus compete against each other - and the US had the assumption, that the EU subsidized Airbus so that Boeing couldn't compete. Because of that the US thought about tariffs that would have countered this.

load more comments
view more: next ›