this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
22 points (92.3% liked)

Star Trek

10571 readers
63 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-07 LD 5x04 "A Farewell to Farms"
11-14 LD 5x05 "Star Base 80?"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angels"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

StarTrek.com link featuring the second chapter of "The Scheimer Barrier".

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I usually love bad humour. But these Very Short Treks are just terrible.

I do like the TAS animation style though. And that the actual actors are voicing the characters is great too. Everything else ... not so much. Bummer. πŸ™

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This one is very dumb (and I expect the others will be as well), but it worked a lot better for me than the first one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I mean yes, it's dumb, but I didn't really go into these expecting they'd be particularly clever or ground-breaking. This one was silly and I had fun, I look forward to the rest of them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That was just plain terrible. The first one was offensive, and this one was lame. The next I expect to be both.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

So far I'm pretty disappointed with these 'very short treks'. I really enjoyed Short Treks and was hoping these would be as good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

These are just horrible. Attempts at dry humor without being smart. I feel embarrassed for the writers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This episode reminded me of what Mel Brooks purportedly said: "Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall into an open manhole and die."

Also, Spork was one of the Vulcan proper names submitted by Bob Justman to Gene Roddenberry during the show's production: https://news.lettersofnote.com/p/star-trek-planet-vulcan-proper-names

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know it is low budget but does the humour have to be so Family Guy?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

That is an insult to Family Guy and to The Orville.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think this one is better than the last one, but that's a very low bar to clear. The animation is done well in TAS style. This episode is like a Saturday Night Live skit that falls flat. Not innovative, just tepid. I've now learned to temper my expectations for the rest of the Very Short Treks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, that's oh for two. I don't think this instalment was quite as rough as the first, but it also didn't have Pete Holmes, so it gets points for that alone.

For whatever reason I assumed each of the VSTs would be done by different studios, but this is the same team that worked on the first. I don't have high hopes for the rest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I understood that the EP/Showrunner is the same for all, and the writer of the first one. So, he set the tone. Sigh.

A am still hopeful for β€˜Holograms all the way down’ as it has Aaron Waltke as the writer credited.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

These make Picard look like a masterpiece

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suspect each episode will have different styles of humor as a form of experimentation to see what sticks to the wall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

One might therefore hope that there might be one in the set that I don’t find so unbearably cringey that I might want to watch it more than once.