People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.
======
We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.
======
Also check out the following communities:
[email protected] [email protected]
They keep mentioning a 20mph marking but the road in the pic is very clearly a 21mph road
If the council maintained the road markings like they are supposed to then companies meeting their obligations to repaint markings would never make the news. It only gets picked up on when the original marking is basically non existent anyway.
Yeah, 100%. This is the town's fault IMO - not maintaining the markings in the first place (it's not the contractor's fault that the old marking is non-existent), and then probably refusing to pay the contractor "extra" to repaint the whole thing.
This is perfection.
Even if it was drawn complete, I have no idea how this is shape supposed to be an oval. It literally has straight edges.
Sandwich gas company road work for network upgrades mocked over incomplete paint job. Got it.