Android

Do smartphone benchmarks matter?

Probably, but not for me.

Are they still a useful reference and do you consider them when shopping for an upgrade?

No.

Do smartphone benchmarks matter?

Benchmarks matter inasmuch as it reflects the user experience, which is to say, benchmark numbers taken alone are meaningless. However, if you tell me a game runs with specific characteristics of user experience such as quality settings and frame rate, that data describe what I can experience playing that game.

Maybe I don't play that game. Perhaps, I'm not a mobile gamer at all. Even then, benchmarks can provide value by describing what real world performance is attainable provided that benchmarks reflect real user experiences.

I would say that benchmarks matter but only within the context of how benchmark numbers relate to a tangible thing you could experience with the phone. A CPU score? I think the value is questionable until you talk about how an app runs.

Are they still a useful reference and do you consider them when shopping for an upgrade?

I think benchmarks are more useful for enthusiasts to understand relative performance but are usually detached from the user experience that I really care about when making a purchase.

I want to know the benchmarks, but these would not drive my purchasing decision. I want to hear from reviewers who actually used the phone... because I plan to use the phone to do phone things, not to run benchmarks.

Given the cost of phones lately, everything matters! I was seriously looking to buy a new phone since the one I have is showing its age at 4 years. I looked at specifications, performance and reviews. You can buy smartphones now for similar screen, cam & battery specs but widely different pricing. Benchmarks gives me a rough idea on how the performance of a lower priced smartphone will compare to what I have right now or a more pricer phone. Is it the only reason for me to choose a smartphone? No. Is it one of the points that I look at to see how much bang do I get for my hard earned money, absolutely! Given that phones have become outrageously expensive, I want to know how much more I am paying for a given "improvement"

Do smartphone benchmarks matter?

Maybe? I look at them from time to time. For most people it is just a number and it is nice for an average user to confirm that the new phone is a little better than the previous.

I recently beta-tested a device (been using it since May). And I ran some benchmarks on it. I noticed that someone else was also benchmarking the device before and after pushing updates. So, I feel that there are companies out there trying to perform well on the benchmarks.

Are they still a useful reference and do you consider them when shopping for an upgrade?

I'm mostly concerned about the following, in no particular order:

• age of the SoC
• screen refresh rate
• availability of replacement parts and repairability
• durability
• the company selling the device (CSR, ESG, reputation)
• whether or not the device is an rebranded rectangle from an OED
• bloatware

Bloatware removes many brands from my list of potential devices. Yes, I could use adb to remove them, or maybe even root my phone, but I shouldn't have to buy a device with Facebook baked in.

@Curated_Android @android

> Do smartphone benchmarks matter?

Depends.

> Are they still a useful reference and do you consider them when shopping for an upgrade?

Yup!

x

I think a good review of the overall perceived performance is more important. Some phones are fairly powerful on paper in their specs, but real world performance can be very different. That might not even show in benchmarks: CPU might score great, GPU might score great, but somehow day to day performance even just scrolling the home screen is horrible. I've even seen phones where 3D games render faster than just a plain 2D scrolling in the settings app.

I guess benchmarks can be useful to put some numbers on, but most don't end up benchmarking the Android APIs just the raw performance. But it's not gonna catch that the CPU<>GPU bandwidth is insufficient for a basic ScrollView to be smooth as new items gets rendered.

My Galaxy S7 ended up slower than even a an aging Galaxy Nexus or Nexus 5 despite being much better in most specs, even running the display at 720p instead of 1440p, resolution didn't make a difference whatsoever. My OneTouch Idol 3 was unbearingly slow despite having the exact same chipset as a Motorola model that ran butter smooth.

They only matter if you are big into smartphone gaming and emulation ig

They only matter when considering efficiency, throttling, and battery life. If the next SoC has throttling, efficiency issues, i would not consider buying it. Smartphone SoCs have become plenty fast for regular everyday tasks (even midrange ones). It's not a matter of "If it can?" Anymore as much as, how long? If you don't get the fastest flagship, it will still do whatever tasks you throw at it (barring heavy gaming/emulation) just that much slower.

I have a smartphone with 6gb of ram and 6GB of virtual ram powered by dimensity 700. It's still plenty fast for most tasks and light to medium gaming and does multitask well. It slows down, but only when throttling. The performance is sufficient. I will get another year out of this smartphone but will need to upgrade for security updates and increased ram(some LLMs need that much ram)

Edit: typo

I would need to be a serious enthusiast to benchmark a phone unless it's for pure curiosity.

Benchmarks are less important on phones as the hardware doesn't change through it's life. If I was writing custom drivers or testing custom images, sure. Regular benchmarks make sense to see if software changes are correctly utilizing the hardware. That falls squarely in enthusiast territory though.

For comparison, when I building a new PC, I turn all the knobs to 11 and overclock it to full capacity. Benchmarks show performance numbers as well as test system stability. I'll benchmark again after major hardware changes or major driver changes. The system wasn't built in a lab and components are all selected by me to meet my performance goals.

Now that I think about it, benchmarks on any device makes sense for troubleshooting. If I had a problem with my phone, running benchmarks could be extremely useful in identifying what components are failing. Still, I have rarely, if ever, done that.

And no. I don't bother with benchmarking new phones. Performance is nice, but functionality is more important to me. I will absolutely minimize stress on the components to ensure longevity of the device.

They used to but I think we're past the point that most matter. Battery life being the exception. Phones are more than powerful enough these days so unless you're using it to play some serious games they don't really matter anymore.

As long as the phone works well I don't worry too much about the bechmarks. I would rather use my phone for some years and enjoy the ride. I think at some point I just tired of chasing the latest shiny Pokemon and just try to enjoy what I have.

We shall see in a few years if I feel the same.

No.

I use my phone to make calls, text, and read lemmy posts. I could probably get by with an iPhone 3 or a pixel 5 or something equally low powered.

• No
• Also, no

They used to, but now all smartphones are sufficiently powerful, so I don't even worry about it anymore.