this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
215 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3664 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Netanyahu reportedly met this month with three foreign policy envoys working with former president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump — who could yet win the election despite being convicted Thursday on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in his New York state hush money case.

Netanyahu, who benefited immensely from Trump’s first term, is arguably hoping for a similar dividend in the event of a second. In the interim, he has openly rejected the Biden administration’s hopes for the Palestinian Authority to take the lead in the postwar administration of Gaza, and he and his allies have shown no interest in even engaging in the White House on reviving pathways for a Palestinian state. And contrary to the Biden administration’s wishes, Netanyahu may soon act on a Republican invitation to address a joint session of Congress.


It’s not just Netanyahu who is waiting for Trump. The evidence is more clear that Russian President Vladimir Putin is holding out for a Trump victory, which would probably help the Kremlin consolidate its illegal conquests of Ukrainian territory. My colleagues reported last month that Trump and his inner circle have outlined the terms of a potential settlement between Moscow and Kyiv that they would attempt to usher in if in power. “Trump’s proposal consists of pushing Ukraine to cede Crimea and the Donbas border region to Russia, according to people who discussed it with Trump or his advisers and spoke on the condition of anonymity because those conversations were confidential,” they reported.

Such a move would fracture the transatlantic coalition built up in support of Ukraine’s resistance to Russian invasion. It would cement the Republican turn away from Europe’s security at a time when Western resolve around Ukraine is flagging. And it would be yet another sign of Trump’s conspicuous affection the strongman in the Kremlin.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 5 months ago

The world is waiting for all three to die.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 5 months ago (1 children)

War criminals of a feather need to stick together.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Trump isn't really a war criminal yet. Although selling out our spies and operatives to Russia was a dick move.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

Does it count that his follower flew a confederate flag in the Capitol?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

He's was a US president, war criminal is part of the job description

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean, I wouldn't exactly call him NOT a war criminal (same as Obama). He continued our various foreign involvements and often made them worse.

https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/trumps-war-pardons-are-sabotaging-the-military-justice-system

[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Weird. Mention putin and all his employees show up in the comments

Hint; They cosplay as leftists

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Left, right... These are meaningless labels when progressives / social democrats / libertarians have to join forces against authoritarian trash of any kind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Anarchists too!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Weird. If I worked for the Internet Research Agency, this is what I’d say to sow distrust and division.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If I clicked on your name and read your post history, I’d hope you’re getting paid to post that consistently. If not you’re getting screwed by your ideology.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That’s not how ideology works. And judging by that statement, you lack one, if you fear getting “screwed” by your ideology.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I fear that both situations will get uglier after the US election, regardless of who wins. If Trump wins, Biden will try to force things to a definitive conclusion before he leaves office, and if Biden wins, Putin and Netanyahu will give up on trying not to provoke the US in hope of working with Trump again.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If Trump wins, Biden will try to force things to a definitive conclusion before he leaves office

He'll only have two months. What do you suppose he could do in two months that can resolve this conflict which has taken years?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bibi would for sure be elated for Trump presidency 2 because he’d get not only zero pushback but probably a sharp escalation in military aid, but I don’t think he’s waiting for shit. Vladi probably needs Trump to destroy NATO from within and then start pushing further into Eastern Europe.

That’s not necessarily true for Bibi, and to be clear I’m not doing a ‘genocide joe’ thing, but if something wild happens like Trump stroking out before the election I think he’ll actually try to finish his war crimes before the election is over.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think he will just keep going no matter who is in charge. Exterminating a population of millions is hard and takes unrelenting effort. People are resourceful and go to great lengths not to die.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That’s more or less what I was trying to get across

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Can’t the administration deny Netanyahu a visa/entry?

Like, yes there will be political cost to this, but letting him grandstand propaganda in the house is also going to cost politically. Which would be worse? Especially when there’s an ICJ arrest warrant potentially dropping soon - “we want to avoid a potential international incident regarding the Israeli PM” plays better imo than headlines like “King Bibi lauded by Congress, garnering more US support and friendship” whilst the MAGAs get/give handshake photo opportunities

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The bombardment triggered a blaze that swept through parts of a makeshift tent camp in the environs of Rafah, the territory’s southernmost city, killing at least 45 Palestinians and injuring hundreds more.

Images of charred bodies and screaming children proliferated in the aftermath, adding to the already considerable pressure on President Biden to change course in its staunch support for Israel’s campaign.

Tzachi Hanegbi, national security adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, told local radio this week that his government expected to wage its operations in Gaza for “at least another seven months.” He said the extended mission would be “to fortify our achievement and what we define as the destruction of the governmental and military capabilities” of Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups in the territory.

Netanyahu reportedly met this month with three foreign policy envoys working with former president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump — who could yet win the election despite being convicted Thursday on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in his New York state hush money case.

“In his eight years as the GOP’s standard-bearer, Trump has led a stark shift in the party’s prevailing orientation to become more skeptical of foreign intervention such as military aid to Ukraine,” my colleagues wrote.

My colleagues reported this week about growing tensions between Kyiv and officials in the Biden administration, with Ukraine pushing its Western allies to loosen rules over the usage of some of their weaponry on targets on Russian soil.


The original article contains 1,132 words, the summary contains 248 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I wonder if Linkerbaan has seen this yet. And what his reaction is.

load more comments
view more: next ›