this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
71 points (92.8% liked)

Linux

48143 readers
791 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

clean install: you make a backup, nuke the computer, install a fresh upgraded copy of the distro you want from a live usb, copy your data again to the computer.

upgrade: you wait 'till the distro' developers release an upgrade you can directly install from your soon to be old distro, you use a command like sudo do-release-upgrade

and why do you upgrade like that?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I follow the official upgrade method. Can’t be bothered to mess around with anything more complicated than that. Besides, the devs probably understand the system better than I do, so there has to be a reason why that is the preferred way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

This is my plan A. I'll only go to plan B if something goes wrong — which has happened to me a couple times. I tried to upgrade Ubuntu (LTS, I forget which version) years ago, but it failed hard. I still don't know why. It wasn't something I could figure out in half an hour, and it wasn't worth investing more time than that.

Come to think of it, it's possible all my upgrade woes came down to Nvidia drivers. It was a common problem on Suse (TW), to the point where I pinned my kernel version to avoid the frequent headaches. I'll try a rolling distro again when I switch to AMD, maybe.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Neither. I use a rolling release distro.

But if I have to use release based distros, I probably would clean install.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

A rolling release distro is basically a requirement for me. I abhor major release upgrades. They're usually labor intensive and often break things.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Upgrade. It works perfectly fine and when it doesn’t figuring out what’s going on learns me something and several times has resulted in fix commits to the packages.

E: there’s some people saying they do clean installs on Ubuntu. They’re right that ubuntu breaks shit all the time but I’ve solved that by simply not using the bad distros.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I like you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Upgrading Ubuntu LTS since 2014. It's always a good idea to read the release notes in order to know what's changed. In general LTS-to-LTS upgrades have been trouble-free.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Rolling with Gentoo here. Reinstall is not performed even when complete hardware upgrade has been done.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Well, I also use a rolling release distro, my disk died last week so I had to reinstall, so technically FULL hardware update might require a reinstall (safer than copying the root folder from one disk to another since the old one was bad), but yeah, before that I've replaced almost every piece of that laptop without a reinstall, even switched from Nvidia to AMD.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Depends on the distro. On Debian I upgrade cause I know it works well. On Ubuntu I always had issues after an upgrade so I ~~do a clean install~~ don't use Ubuntu anymore.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

NixOS with impermanence. Every reboot is a fresh install.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Clean install on a new computer. Then upgrades until the computer gets retired. Debian at home, Ubuntu server at work.

I like playing with distros and other OSes in VMs, if the thing doesn't have a well defined upgrade procedure it gets ditched pretty soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Try out immutable distros like NixOS: that is stunning in upgrading.

'73

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I tried once. Could not figure it out. I'll leave that to the young people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Wait for a bugfix release after a major release. Then upgrade.

need moar bugs fixed, just to be safe

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

upgrades have been working fine here, both linux and windows, for well over a decade.

only if a system is also being repurposed at the time of the 'upgrade', or if i'm changing the connection type of the boot drive (such as from sata to nvme, or switching an older system to ahci mode) do i install 'from scratch'.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I always upgrade as I can't deal with a clean install every so often. This warrants using a distro that does handle this well, though*. Which, thankfully, isn't a big deal as most distros support this anyways.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Wait for the distro to officially release an upgrade path. Only do a fresh install if it doesn't work.

On Windows however whenever I would get a new pc in which I was prepping for staff(I worked in IT) the first thing I'd do after unboxing it is a wipe of the factory Windows install and do a clean install with the latest ISO from Microsoft.

No bloatware, network managers, anti virus etc nonsense. We had all of our own stuff for that which applied via Group Policy anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

It depends. For Fedora I just do a in place upgrade. However once in a blue moon I do a reinstall.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I almost always prefer clean installation when possible, while making sure to backup important content from highly accessed folders like Desktop, Downloads and Documents (on Windows), for example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

It just feels nice! Nice and fresh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Upgrade. Have been upgrading my main machine since 2014.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

rpm-ostree upgrade

is enough on uBlue, as system release upgrades are automatically staged and just like normal updates.

rpm-ostree rebase may be needed on Fedora Atomic

Use a well versioned package manager guys.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It depends on the distro. Some of them have some shitty ass upgrade process and it breaks shit, and others are just awesome. I personally use a rolling release so I don't have to worry about upgrades. I do get some issues here and there with some big upgrades, but nothing really major. I've only had to reinstall twice in the last 2.5 years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

make a backup

Pffftt... coward.

/s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

It's not a clean install if you're backing shit up!

Also, I just map my home directories to my NAS so I don't have to worry about backups.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I upgrade Fedora from one version to another as doing a clean install would be a lot of work. Maybe I’m just too much of a rookie, but I don’t see the advantages of a clean install.

Even if I installed Fedora on a new computer, I’d just use my clonezilla backup if possible. But I haven’t tried it so I don’t know if this would work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is actually a question I'd like some opinions on!

I have a ton of headless servers running Debian that I just replace the sources.list for an upgrade. I imagine things are much more complicated when switches like X11 to Wayland happen, so all desktop environments get a wipe/install instead... But maybe I'm just making a lot of work for myself doing that!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Nah, regular upgrades should be fine for those too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Upgrade. Don't wanna mess with restoring/preserving data and configs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Fedora, I usually wait 1-2 weeks for the last bugs to be found+fixed and extensions to catch up, and then just upgrade in-place. Haven't had a major upgrade problem for years now, it's mostly as smooth as any other offline update. And I don't feel like I have to reinstall the OS every few years on Linux either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I don't think I've ever made a "clean upgrade" on Linux. I've done the opposite though, that is, bring an old install over to a new computer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I usually roll on desktop/laptop and upgrade on headless. Just seems most practical.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The only time I don't do a regular upgrade is for Windows Server. Too much weird shit happens. I like to keep my servers running clean.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I upgrade when it's a distro that releases new versions regularly (for example Fedora with two releases per year). I obviously also upgrade rolling distributions.

Why? Because it's less work and I haven't had many problems with it.

I usually clean install long-term distros like RHEL (or RHEL-based). These don't always have a good upgrade path and I usually only use them on servers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm using a rolling release at the moment, but when I used a more stable release, I always did the upgrade (following the official instructions) because it's faster and more convenient.

I learned the hard way to always keep a backup of my important stuff, regardless of the OS.

The only time I redid a clean install was when I accidentally fucked up my entire filesystem's permissions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Man just when I thought I got the hang of NixOS and setup everything already thanks to the new wiki. I dont think this is worth the trouble for me right now, but maybe in the future.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I backup and then upgrade through the mechanism provided. Why? Lazy. I should take the time to set up a NAS and run most of /home from that, but never have been motivated enough to try it.

I usually let myself lag behind on Fedora to wait until the kinks have been worked out. I just jumped from 38 to 40 in an upgrade and totally regret it. Python is screwed up in distrobox and making problems, but I can roll back too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I always clean install. I have my stuff backed up properly. I’ll go through and make a checklist of frequently used software so I can start off on the right foot. I like that new fresh smell of free space.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It depends on how many versions I am away from the latest, and how much I've messed with the distro.

Usually I stay on an Ubuntu LTS and upgrade from LTS to LTS when that upgrade path is ready. I upgraded from 20.04 to 22.04 this way.

But this time I wanted Pipewire in 24.04, and didn't want to wait for a 22.04 to 24.04 upgrade to be ready. I'm using a bluetooth headset and Pulseaudio is pretty terrible at switching headset profiles. Between not wanting to upgrade an upgraded install, and having messed with Pulseaudio quite a bit trying to get it working, I went ahead and clean installed 24.04 and moved some configs over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Depends on the distro.

On my personal laptop with openSUSE, I have plenty confidence doing all kinds of upgrades and sidegrades (between Leap and Tumbleweed).
The package manager detects conflicts and makes me decide what to do with them. I've never seen the software or distro dependency definitions fuck up, it was always me making a wrong decision.
Well, and if I do make a wrong decision or anything else should go wrong during the upgrade, I can roll back to the BTRFS snapshot before.

On my work laptop, the best I can get is Kubuntu. Apt is much more fickle, since it doesn't have as clear of a concept of what constitutes a conflict, but also what a correct system should look like.
The whole packages feel much more fickle, too, because they've got all these custom patches, so you really don't want to accidentally mix different versions of packages, like might happen in an incomplete upgrade.
And of course, you get one chance at upgrading. If anything goes sideways, you better have your Live USB ready right away.

So, that's why I would prefer to install fresh right away. Of course, my workplace doesn't actually allow me to do that either. They really like to keep me on edge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I've got a desktop that got a dirty install of KDE Neon when the repositories first got put up (before there were isos). Been in-place upgrading it ever since.

load more comments
view more: next ›