I know it's not the point, but I do think it would be easier to set up a photo server than to hack around Google.
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
47 points (88.5% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54476 readers
404 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Look into self hosting
Setup seafile for normal dropbox like functionality and immich for photogallerly.
In the end , after alk rhe effort to trick Google, all your shit aill still be on google.
MiniPCs are quite cheap now on Alibaba or Amazon etc. Wait for a sale on a large HD abd you're good to go.
100% @gargari
Even something simple like syncthing is very easy
Thakns for hte gerat tipS!?
Immich is a great service and the app is basically Google photos
I use Immich. Highly recommend.
That's a recipe for data wipeout.
You're trying to trick Google into giving you paid service. It's very much different to ad blocks and whatnot. This will cause you mountains of problem, if possible in the first place...
at that point it'd be easier for you to encode the data as a video and upload it to YouTube. which someone did, btw (can't find the link tho)
YouTube reencodes your uploads so I don't see how could you decode your original data.
Because it encodes it visually
This is true, but I forgot to mention that the PoC I saw encoded the data into what is essentially a bunch of QR codes, which reduces the density of the data but beats the compression of Youtube.
The word you're looking for is steganography
Mm no, that is encoding a message in the image, but the image remains the same and normal. Only the msg within is hidden cryptographycally...
Recently I've read a comment here on Lemmy about someone who keeps an old pixel at home on a charger, and runs Syncthing on it to sync pictures to the phone so they will get automatically uploaded.
If you were to go that way, you could obfuscate your images before copying to the syncthing shared folder. If you were to encrypt it, be sure to only encrypt the content of the images, to keep any headers and such so that google still sees it as an image. You may try with encrypting the whole file, you'll have to try it out if that works.
Other things that may be interesting:
- several years ago (2-3?) I've heard of a fork of the Simple Gallery app (the orange gallery app on fdroid) that if I remember correctly encrypted your photos and uploaded them that way to google photos. In google photos they were "viewable", but they were just noise
- you mentioned Docker, so I suspect you're not afraid of selfhosting. If you have the storage, you may like Immich. It's basically a google photos clone. App on f-droid.
I just buy a pixel 1 for 50 bucks. Then I use that to upload my current photos. Works flawlessly
The hard part of the problem is not spoofing the pixel, but preserving your privacy.
Your solution solves the easier problem, but it doesn't preserve your privacy.
i don't have unlimited photo storage for any of my two pixel 3 anymore. is this regional?
Yup. They spoof you as Pixel OG and you get Unlimited Backup in OG resolution. I have been using it on my main acc for past 6 months or so.
I am not sure that can be done. For some devices, the free backups only apply to "Storage saver" quality, which means decreasing resolution and quality, which obviously couldn't be done here.
Secondly, there is some file size limit. I think 50MB/image, but you could split the files, if it worked in the first place.
there are modded google photos apk but idk how much of that can be trusted