this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
368 points (95.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43896 readers
936 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would really rather that these were actual examples, and not conspiracy theories. We all have our own unsubstantiated ideas about what shadowy no-gooders are doing, but I'd rather hear about things that are actually happening.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 165 points 10 months ago (19 children)

“Democrats are liberal/progressive”

In reality, they’re pretty conservative.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (9 children)

They are still liberal though but not progressives. Liberalism isn’t necessarily a left wing ideology.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

A lot of leftists (and I hardly ever saw it before coming on Lemmy) use 'Liberal' to mean Classic or Neo Liberal - basically a synonym of capitalist.. That's not at all what it means in American politics, where it means the opposite of Conservative. If we used that definition, Conservatives would be called Liberals as well as Liberals being Liberals, which obviously makes no sense for US lingo. However, they both are Liberals in the neo/classic sense as most US Liberals aren't calling for communism.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The conservatives are only liberal in the economic sense. They are the party of book banning, anti-abortion and anti-lgbtq. Liberalism is also about human rights and freedoms. But just because you think gays should be allowed to marry and acces to have an abortion should be a right that doesn’t put you left on the political spectrum or even make you a progressive. Since that is pretty much a centrist political position in the rest of the world. Most Democrats are liberal in the economic sense but also in the human liberty sense. But only a few Democrats in the house and senate can be truly called progressives. Since most Democrats are fine with the status quo and aren’t pushing society forward. They are just fighting of the attacks of the GOP

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This sort of confusion is why I think we need to always define economic and social political positions separately rather than lump them together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You'd need more than two parties for that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Right, I agree. The progressive side of the US is not fairly represented by Democrats nationally.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s not at all what it means in American politics

Two red scares and a cold war created an Orwellian memory hole such that Americans don’t even have the words anymore. It’s double-plus ungood.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)