Asklemmy

43846 readers

666 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

A term for lack of perspective on your own contextual knowledge? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Is there a term for that phenomenon where someone gets so far into a topic that they become unaware of how much contextual knowledge they have about it?

Then they write some inscrutable technical docs, use unexplained acronyms, or tell a story about “he”, "she’ and/or “they” where you have no idea who they’re talking about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Relevant XKCD

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

relevant

Relevant XKCD

Edit: is there no way to get a thumbnail to render this, can the image be found and linked to rather than page?

Edit2: can we get a bot that autoconverts links and stuff to this, people would just have to remember to input the image url not the page in which it appears

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

I see the image!

load more comments (1 replies)