this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
205 points (94.8% liked)

World News

32317 readers
793 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You'd think this would give us some wiggle money to play with to build out new energy infrastructure. You're wrong though, there is no wiggle. We need all renewables like Germany.

Although the transition to EVs will require an enormous increase in base production capacity, it would be wasteful to build out nuclear to meet it.

$16m an hour might seem like a lot of damage, but nuclear can only exacerbate economic loss which is equally important as climatic loss.

Renewables now!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Germany predominantly sources its energy from fossil fuels. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Germany

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And in 6 years, we will end coal as the first nation of the industrialized countries. The US is currently planing to phase it out in 16 years. Some other countries do not even have a plan for the next 20 years. What is your point?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

i wish we would do a space race to end coal

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago

There are more fossil fuels then just coal though. You could squint and if you were paid to be dishonest you could say that Lignite isn't coal and therefore in 6 years when Germany is still burning Lignite, they have transitioned away from coal. Additionally they are not planning on transitioning away from Natural Gas at all.