this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
150 points (100.0% liked)
New York Times gift articles
834 readers
126 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
even if your goal is valid, this is not the way to accomplish that
you cannot cut off your arms in expectation of immediatelly evolving wings
i respect your opinion. The issue is that without causing severe economic pain to businesses, they'd never change away from the way they've been accustomed to doing business. So, businesses essentially have to be forced to do business as they're told, or else close because they can't make a profit in the regulatory environment. There must be a cost to looking outside the country for anything whatsoever which makes the act of searching so onerous that they'll have trouble making a profit.
Frankly, it needs to be both costly and labor-intensive if this is going to work. Every business should have to justify to the government every foreign purchase, sale, or labor. And they should have to pay more for it than for any possible domestic version.
That's just complete bullshit. A company doesn't need to spend millions of dollars in legal fees to figure out which tariffs apply today to understand that locally made products don't have tariffs. They need to know for certain that it'll be more expensive to import in the future than build a domestic factory. It takes years to build a factory, today's costs don't matter, the costs in 5 years do.
If the goal of the tariffs was to increase domestic production, they should have been phased in over time to give time for the factories to be built. The last month of chaotic tariffs meant that no company could figure out what production to move domestic. At some point in the chain, some things must be imported because they don't exist in the United States. If a product contains rare earth elements, some portion of it will be imported from China since they process 95% of them in the world. So the question isn't do we import it not, it's what piece do we import. If companies knew exactly what the tariff rates are going to be, it still takes years to build a factory. That process won't start until there's a cost benefit analysis between paying tariffs and building a factory, and that analysis can't start without knowing what the tariff rates are. With the tariffs being introduced, paused, resumed, cancelled within a month meant that no cost benefit analysis could be done because the costs might be wildly different tomorrow. Businesses won't invest if they're not certain the investment will pay off eventually, and with how chaotic tariff rates have been, no one can be certain, so no one is investing.
Tariffs can be used to spur domestic production, but the way they were used over the last couple of months is not going to. Just like any tool, they need to be used the correct way to achieve the desired results.
Best answer in the whole thread.