this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32297 readers
1065 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

This is coming from Glenn Greenwald, a known Putin shill, so all this could mean is the efforts to maintain truth on Wikipedia, since Ruzzia and her allies worldwide (including the American Republican party, or at least the 'MAGA' portion) constantly seek to obfuscate the truth and alter articles critical of them, their positions, their narratives.

Now I'm not saying there isn't a shred of truth, there usually is with shills like Greenwald, so I'm sure the US and their allies are actively involved in doing something similar, but nobody lies like the current Ruzzian regime and their allies, their people are so misinformed and propagandized that they wouldn't know the truth if it smacked them over the head.

Some sources to back up my point:

https://gizmodo.com/wikipedia-russia-ukraine-propaganda-suspicious-edits-1849673060

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/russia-edits-mh17-wikipedia-article

https://www.iflscience.com/woman-writes-fake-russian-history-on-wikipedia-for-over-a-decade-before-being-caught-64245

https://www.new-east-archive.org/articles/show/2967/wikipedia-russian-government-edits

https://slate.com/technology/2022/03/wikipedia-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-edits-kyiv-kiev.html

https://www.npr.org/2022/04/01/1090279187/russia-wikipedia-fine

https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2022/03/03/wikimedia-foundation-stands-with-communities-defending-free-knowledge/

https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/11/22973293/wikipedia-editor-russia-belarus-ukraine

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the sources. Greenwald is so far right and has gone so far off the deep end of conspiracy theory stuff that it really doesn't make sense to believe anything he says.

load more comments (3 replies)