this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
988 points (99.1% liked)

World News

45372 readers
4384 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Global leaders criticized Trump’s new tariffs, which range from 10% to 49%, warning of trade wars and economic fallout.

The UK and Italy urged negotiation, while Brazil passed a reciprocity bill. China and South Korea vowed countermeasures.

Australia and New Zealand rejected Trump’s logic, citing existing trade deals and low tariffs. Norfolk Island was baffled by a 29% duty despite having no exports.

Financial markets dropped, oil and bitcoin sank, and leaders warned of inflation. Analysts say Trump risks fracturing global trade with little to gain economically.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 day ago (23 children)

I recently read an article that suggested the best retaliation would be to stop enforcing US intellectual property in the EU. One of the biggest exports they have is media, if we would stop enforcing their copyright it would cost them a lot of money.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (18 children)

You don't even have to go that far. Just adopt sane copyright laws, like copyright only lasting the life of the artist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

Copyright and patent laws should just go away entirely.

The amount of resources we spend enforcing them, just so we can spend more resources on the products themselves, could all be spent improving the lives of people who need it.

Most great art doesn't make much money anyways, barely more than a service job if you're lucky. It's the trashy-shit for low-standards morons that makes an egregious amount of money, like the marvel crap we keep seeing every year.

I'd be fine with less marvel-crap in the world. It'll make what we do get more impactful, and we can dedicate more resources to fewer, higher-quality products.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's a great plan for letting those mega corps steal from the little guy EVEN more than they already do

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not really.

Corporations aren't going to be making billions of dollars off of, say Photoshop, if copyright and patents laws didn't exist.

Same goes for hollywood movies.

You're peddling rhetoric that was put here by your oppressors so you will work against your own interests. Congratulations.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The entities with the established distribution networks will make the money, not the little guy who makes their own little story.

If I write a little seld published novel, under your system, Hollywood can just take that story and make a movie of it without my permission. How is that better? You think more people pirating will take down these mega corps? Your system is chaos that's even worse than the current model.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They can do so currently by making a couple of minor changes and settling for a pittance because your lawsuit would bankrupt you.

"Chaos" is a better system than one benefitting corporations only.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Why do so many people on the Internet default to a completely unnuanced worldview? Like there's more than two diametrically opposed options that can be taken.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Your dilemma essentially translates to "wahh, he stole my idea!"

You're also missing the forest for the trees, again. How is hollywood going to make an egregious amount of money off of 'your' idea without copyright and patent laws? Without them, piracy isn't piracy. It's just a normal and legal way of sharing media.

Sad watching how hard you people go to bat for your oppressors, but it really puts into perspective why things are the way they are.

The average person just can't see past their conditioning or how hard they've been indoctrinated to support a system that works against them. In the words of Mark Twain, "it's easier to fool a man than to convince him he'd been fooled."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

By having the resources to create and distribute a product with polish.

Acting like you're smarter than the people you're talking to while missing the very obvious point that we're not starting from nothing. Being pedantic about me referring to piracy by what it's called now doesn't change how impractical it would be to have no ownership at all of ideas. Why would anyone pay for content at all?

Your "solution" means no one can make a living doing creative things. The current system has flaws that can be fixed. "No system at all" is worse for literally everyone involved, both creators and consumers of said content.

You should stop publicly felating yourself over how unshackled your mind is, since this idea is so incredibly stupid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

By having the resources to create and distribute a product with polish.

Yeah, I'm going to ignore you after this. You're too far behind and I can't be arsed to bring you up to speed.

For everyone else, this commenter clearly doesn't understand that without copyright and patent laws, hollywood won't be able to restrict access to their content behind artificial scarcity. Anyone will be allowed to share their movies freely, which will have a direct impact on their bottom line.

This is why corporations like copyright and patent laws. It's also another example of how useful idiots have been conditioned to work against their own interests and fight anyone who fights back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Yup, you've realized your plan is stupid but decided you'll act haughty and bow out of the conversation all together to avoid admitting it.

Why would anyone make a movie if they couldn't at least support the cost of making the giving movie to begin with? Like, try thinking one step through your own idiotic idea.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)