this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1704 points (94.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21311 readers
657 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    No, you only should be using Wayland if you need some of it's features. If you don't need mixed refresh rate/mixed scaling you're fine using X.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    X' architecture is insecure. There's no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That's just one example.
    Wayland is necessary.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Yet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It's just another FUD.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    I'd hardly call that an exploit. There's no protection.

    load more comments (7 replies)