this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
622 points (86.1% liked)

Memes

45691 readers
1653 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Generally when people admit things that are politically inconvenient to them it is worth listening. If Trump admitted he did tax evasion would you be like "nuh-uh he is lying! He's a liar he didn't do tax evasion!"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If trump admitted to anything, I would look for how he was trying to spin it in his benefit. Because he, like a tory, does not act unless he thinks its going to benefit him.

Trump does not speak based on fact. Just grift. His admission of anything is not statements based in facts, just grift.

If they happen to align with truth? Glory be. But his statements appearing inconvenient is not a measurement of truth. Just like the tories.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay, how do you thing the Tories who strongly oppose china benefit from this admission? What is your theory?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont know what their current grift is. I just know how they act, and have acted, since their inception.

They arent proof that any statement is true. Citing them is like citing a creationist flat earther on your geology paper.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If a creationist was like "I'm lying. The earth is actually x billion years old" I'd cite them as "even the creationists don't believe their own rhetoric"