politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
No voters are changing their minds in regards to candidates right now and haven't for literally months. Both campaigns are in a race against the couch, but only the Trump campaign seems to know it.
All of this goes to nothing if Trump wins, and for his voters, it's all fake news anyways. If Harris doesn't return to the Undecided/uncommitted voters she abandoned at the convention, there simply aren't the votes to get her over the finish line. It's shocking to realize that she campaigned like any cohort of democratic voters were disposable, but I guess that's consistent with the administrations (and the US writ large) view on Muslims and middle easterners
It's almost like this isn't about the election; it's about justice
If you lose the election, this evaporates. The administration could have started this within hours after taking office. Instead they waited literally years to pursue a case. And perhaps now it's too late to make a difference.
So if it's about justice, why didn't the administration pursue the issue from day one? If it's about justice, why didn't they go after Trump for treason for instigating a violent insurrection to overturn the will of the people on J6? Where was 'justice' then? The administration pursued the least of Trump's crimes and only once an election cycle began. Miss me with this feigned sense of justice.
You mean DoJ, which is well at arms length from the administration (for now). Plenty of people have for a long time rightly criticized Merrick Garland of being overly cautious with all of this. Still, there is something to be said for being overly cautious when, for the first time in US history, considering charging a former president with federal crimes. Even if "pursuing a case" had started with more haste, it would still have taken years to come to charges, because you don't lay those charges in this situation without having an airtight case. That requires a very lengthy investigative process.
I'll give you a pass for not knowing how the US justice system works, since I'm sure you don't live here.
If Trump wins, any long term case against him is gone. Time is the most essential factor in prosecuting him.