this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
79 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30556 readers
180 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Consoles need to be more powerful because of the perceived importance that marketing has created for gamers desperate need for graphical fidelity over all else.

The gameplay of COD and FIFA doesn't matter so long as it's sharper/more crisp/more real. Granted, this mindset has somewhat faded, however it is still present and as a result corporations are still pushing it because while 60hz may be an old standard, Sony now has 120hz TV's to sell you.

In addition to that, COD and FIFA don't have to be nearly as well optimized if the consoles can just brute force through it. Also, without newer consoles that are more powerful, there then won't be games that are too powerful to run on older consoles, meaning they won't get to sell you new consoles because of the old games you want to play. Instead they can sell you the new games that only work on the new consoles.

I'm sure there are more reasons, but those seem to be the 3 core facets that make up the purpose of console gaming; sell the lie of the best graphical fidelity, make a game that requires a high powered console to play it, market it as "needing the best of the best" to be able to play it, and suddenly you have a brand loyal set of consumers who keep returning to the fishhook.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Enter Nintendo. Crappy 9yo SOC, sure, whatever, here are some fun games that aren’t graphically advanced.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The console wars have always been between Sony and Microsoft. Nintendo does the innovation side of things

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, it was Coleco/Atari - Coleco lost

Then Nintendo/Atari - Atari lost

Then Sega/Nintendo

Then Sega/Nintendo/Sony - Sega lost

Then Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft - Nintendo lost, but pivoted to play a different game.

Then you can throw things in there like 3DO and Jaguar Turbo FX, but they didn’t do so got to be considered contenders in the “war”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I meant console wars of graphical fidelity from my memory. I don't remember it mattering as much when I was young, but I could be wrong still.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You must be younger than me. I grew up in the 90s and the Sega/Nintendo rivalry was intense.

I think it was the SNES/Genesis era when “who has the better graphics” started to matter.

At the time, I was actually of the opinion that the N64 was a step down from the SNES. Sure the graphics were 3D, but they looked like shit even then. Nintendo really fucked up by sticking with cartridges that generation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Just a bit I imagine, I grew up in the 90's too but I was young in my graduating class

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)