Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers

329 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

💰 Please help cover server costs.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Any reliable group making AV1 releases consistently? (lemm.ee)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So...yeah. Looking at file size, it clearly beats older 264 or even 265. I don't mind if my server is going to have to transcode for most clients, I think the size difference in size might be worth it. But not sure which groups I could focus to look for these AV1 releases, seem they're quite scarce still?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

That is not a transcode you want to do.

Why is that?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Dolby Digital (e-ac & e-ac3) are lossy codecs. So transcoding a lossy codec to a lossless codec, is not a good idea.

You can read more about it here: https://interviewfor.red/en/transcodes.html

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lossy to lossless is fine it's just a waste of space.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It’s extra wasted space because compression artifacts are hard to compress lossless. It’s a shit sandwich, so people advise against it.

load more comments (1 replies)