Science Memes

11217 readers

2739 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

357

I shall exercise against you my right of rejection because you have treated me with contempt. (mander.xyz)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 months ago (17 children)

I'm flipping between "why is there cuneiform Unicode" and "of course there's cuneiform Unicode" much more rapidly than I really expected

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (4 children)

𓂸 𓂹 𓂺 there are hieroglyphs too, and these appear often enough to be included.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Shame I can only see squares there. I wonder why. I can see wikipedia's. Does this work? Two hieroglyphs: 𓂀𓀀

Edit: It does, I can read those in my own comment.

Edit 2: Windows issue? I can see them on Android/sync for lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

I can see both your and the original hieroglyphics just fine on my phone using Firefox, and on windows with the same.

Odd thing is, my wife sometimes gets MY emoji and non-standard text as squares, and we have the exact same phone. The only difference between us is she uses the default keyboard.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (14 replies)