this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
173 points (96.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43807 readers
888 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As greedy as you think they might have been, without them, a lot of smaller bands would have just washed up. People work really hard to make music, shouldn't they get paid for it?
Streaming services didn't exist when this court case happened. Many artists were already suing Napster, but weren't famous enough to get publicity. Someone released an unfinished edit of "I disappear" which is what triggered Metallica to get involved. Dr Dre also jumped into the suit but I've never heard anyone talk about boycotting his music or the music he produced.
They forgot about Dre?