this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
67 points (92.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43896 readers
1038 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

Thinking people in their late teenage years and young adults aren't mature enough to do some of those things is just a big tell of how bad we educate them rather than their brain not being "developed".

Consent is the most obvious example, teenagers are gonna have a sexual life no matter what you want them to do. Removing consent just remove yourself from the responsibility of educating them and entice them to stay hidden.

Driving is also just necessary to anyone working, again being safe just need to be taught, plenty of adults are just as immature and stupid.

The same can be said for drinking or smoking, prevention is so much more effective than restrictions.

However, for voting or joining the army that's when i agree. Because the system is built to prey on them, making sure they stay uneducated and vulnerable. So only then does having restrictions make sens to keep them safe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I don't follow your argument about sex ed and consent.

Sex ed should start as soon as kids can talk, to keep it from being stigmatized and to prevent predation. There is no need to wait until a child reaches sexual maturity for that; in fact, at that point it is too late.

As to driving, most people shouldn't be driving, period. We are, in general, not good at it. Leave it to the professionals.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Sex ed should start as soon as kids can talk

lmfao

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don’t know what’s so funny about that. Teaching your toddler that not everyone can touch their genitals is sex ed, and should absolutely be done as soon as they can understand it…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Ok, in that case I totally agree. But going into detail about actual sex doesn't seem like a great idea that early.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

There's more than one specific topic covered in sex ed.

We teach math to children, but nobody is suggesting that you need to get your toddler into differential equations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Only because you think sex is dirty, because you were stigmatized against talking about it at that age.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Of course I don't think that, it's one of the most natural fucking things in the world. I just think for young children, especially ones who just learned how to talk, there's things they definitely DON'T need to know yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Who said this is what sex ed is about?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)