this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Games

32584 readers
1788 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It doesn't stop. It just never stops.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I loved Cities 1, I was massively looking forward to 2 but it's been nothing but a shitshow.

I've also had a enough of the gaslighting around this game that somehow it's the angry customers that are the problem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (5 children)

The angry customers and the state of the game are problems.

  • it's hard to feel sorry for people who pre-ordered because they got exactly what they paid for - a game of unknown quality and quantity of content
  • it's hard to feel sorry for people who bought post-release because they also got exactly what they paid for - a game where reviews detailed poor quality and quantity of content
  • customers being disappointed and/or wanting a refund is perfectly reasonable
  • people wanting the game to be better is also reasonable
  • people abusing the devs is not reasonable

I'm not going to defend the poor quality of the game because it's obviously bad (from what I gather, anyway - I've not played it myself) and should be improved. But I do think gamers could learn to be a little more responsible with their purchases and inform themselves before buying a game.

I'm pretty over the whole cycle of games coming out and not meeting expectations, people buying them anyway (through pre-orders or day-one purchases), people being unnecessarily rude/hostile/sending death threats to developers as if they were forced to buy the game as gunpoint. Yes, developers should try to do better, yes publishers should often give developers more time to polish up games rather than announcing the release date two years in advance and refusing to delay, but also consumers could really take some responsibility for what they decide to give money to.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Your opinion is stupid, because these people SHOULD be putting this negative pressure on them. It's deserved and the louder they are the better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

these people SHOULD be putting this negative pressure on them. It’s deserved

Was it not implied I agree with that when I said:

The angry customers and the state of the game are problems.

and;

  • customers being disappointed and/or wanting a refund is perfectly reasonable
  • people wanting the game to be better is also reasonable

I'm not going to defend the poor quality of the game because it's obviously bad (from what I gather, anyway - I've not played it myself) and should be improved.

?

I don't see why that would make my opinion stupid. Yes, the studio/publisher should be held to account for the crappy release. But a big part of holding them to account should be not giving them money for it in the first place; not just handing over money and then complaining afterwards. Complaining afterwards is reasonable for the people who did hand over money, but they should also hold themselves accountable for financially rewarding a company that puts out a crappy product - they're part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I knee jerk reacted, sorry.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's okay; I appreciate the apology! :)

I think it's important to look for the nuance in situations and not treat everything as zero-sum. Both sides can have good points and be open to criticism at the same time (this isn't an "enlightened centrist" take, I promise!). I think a lot of discussion online does tend to strip away nuance and take the position that if you show any empathy with one side then it means you must hate the other - I do my best to avoid that!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

You are absolutely right, and clearly a person of wisdom. Have a great day. :)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)