politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Do you guys remember when a huge group of retired intelligence people told us the Hunter laptop had "all the hallmarks or russian disinformation"? Yeah, I dont care or trust what politically motivated people have to say about issues and neither should you.
The word "disinfornation" came from the press. The authors stated it "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation", adding:
Politico (owned btw. by german far right Axel Springer LLC, Germanys Fox News) distorted the meaning of the letter:
Sure, but to anyone that was looking at it knew from the first week it was real, and so they needed to try to pretend it was not.
You had to be a pretty big chump to believe in the laptop to start with. Anybody who still believes any of it is so far up Trump's ass they could chew his hamberders for him.
Uh... its completely confirmed to be true... But sure man!
Doubling down on chump it looks like
That only thing confirmed from that whole fiasco is that Marge is thirsty for Hunter's dong.
Sorry dude, but it has been confirmed, I really dont know what else to tell you. You cant just change reality by denying it.
Source - trust me bro.
Literally Tony Bobilinski at the time, and far right website... the washington post.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controversy
As you can see the laptop was tampered with. It is, as with the buttery males story, a nothing burger.
The problem is it cant be used in court because that is a doubt they put into it. But the emails on the laptop were confirmed (see the far right washington post), and the contents were also confirmed by Bobilinski. And if you care about actual corruption and the truth then you should watch him talk before congress(?) and literally accuse them of crimes.
No, it can't be used in court because it's bullshit. Some emails were confirmed but wildly different numbers each time. I do care about actual corruption and truth (hence why the laptop is BS, seriously did you even read where it said that?). The guy wanted the thing televised but the gop said no. Who's afraid of the truth now?
It was confirmed multiple times and literally by someone on the emails. You can keep making things up but I know what the facts are.
Source - trust me bro. Lol.
Whatever, you do you buckaroo.
Thank you!
Stfu lib
Like pizzagate? When do you people embrace reality? It's hard at first but you'll feel better later.
Sure dude.
What?
Huh?
Typical .ml
Sure dude about what?
As in physical evidence of such a thing exists and can be reviewed and audited for authenticity?
I'll hold my breath while you provide such evidence 👌