this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
297 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

31683 readers
613 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today most Invidious instances are experiencing very harsh ip address rate limiting, it is becoming very very hard to watch yt videos through

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 165 points 6 months ago (38 children)

As much as I like the privacy frontends I think 'we' have to move to alternative platforms sooner than later and pull the bandaid vs. continuing to indirectly be dependent on google as the base platform.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 6 months ago (30 children)

Content creators won't follow because there isn't any monetary incentive to do so. I have been regularly checking out Peertube for 4 years now and it is mostly a backup option for those that one day YouTube might delete their channel.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (21 children)

I remember early YouTube where there wasn't a financial incentive to make content and they clearly did not suffer from a lack of content.

People weren't saying "Oh, well, you can't make money on YouTube so why would you" back then. They made content because they wanted to and because it was fun.

YouTube is just entrenched in the public consciousness much like television was when YouTube came around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

People nowadays are greedy. Youtube it is.

Peertube etc need a monetary incentive.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not really, what it needs is a strong niche community with some reach

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Exactly. For any proposed change, it's going to run up against what I like to call Status Quo Extremism, which is a mindset that suggests that "But that would be different from the status quo" counts as a defeater argument against proposed changes.

The combination of incentives would, as you note, need to be driven by niche interests rather than attempting to reproduce the incentives of the top 0.01% of YouTube creators.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Greedy, yes. But also lots of people believe since long ago that some things on the Internet should be "at no monetary cost" (gratis) It should become common for people to donate money for some things even if it is very little.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

As long as trash like mrbeast is watched by so many people, I have no hope that the broad public will use anything like what we want in the near future.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Monetization shifted the focus from niche hobbyist content to gimmicky shit that is tailored to get a bunch of views. When I see a thumbnail of someone with a weird facial expression, it's my cue to look elsewhere.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)