Asklemmy

43733 readers

1648 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Which games that were reviewed poorly did you actually like? (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally never had a problem with Victoria 3. A bit buggy on release but nothing game breaking

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Back when Spore came out, I was too young to know about most of the hype around it. It was short, yeah, and the end game was odd, but otherwise I remember really enjoying it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The problem with that one was that they overhyped it so much. It was supposed to be an everything simulator, and it just wasn't (although I never actually played it).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Yeah that would have been a huge letdown if I had been aware of all that hype.

But man, if only the huge letdowns of today were as good as spore...

load more comments (4 replies)