this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
1218 points (91.2% liked)

Memes

45432 readers
657 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (157 children)

I don't consider tankies leftists. I'm an anarchist. I consider myself far left.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (132 children)

Can you name a large scale anarchist project with better rights than Cuba or Vietnam?

I'll save you the effort: nah. Catalonia had concentration camps and "free" Ukraine was a bandit dictatorship that empowered kulaks to do pogroms. And they both got crushed partially due to a lack of centralization, and a lack of collaboration with and alienation from popular fronts.

"Tankies" as you put it, are the actual leftists advancing liberation, and not just jerking themselves off about how left they are, which is easy to do when their ideology remains only theoretical. When the rubber hits the road, anarchists fall somewhere between the brutality of socialist projects and capitalism.

As Trotsky said "anarchism is a rain coat that leaks only while it is wet"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (129 children)

I don't believe in rights. at least, there's no such thing as an inalienable right, since governments can and do take them away. I'm not even sure how to begin to answer your question given that I think that you're talking about fictions. sort of like asking me which anarchist society had the most thetans, or protection spirits.

I didn't think that I'd have to explain to somebody that the very existence of a hierarchy implies class structure. but I guess it's true that some people still side with the wrong people at the second international.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (128 children)

I don’t believe in rights.

Not even positive rights? You're literally like "authority means it is by definition a class society" and you don't believe in rights? How do you square that circle?

It honestly feels like this is a cheap rhetorical dismissal because you don't want to compare what the actual material benefits of socialist revolutions are vs anarchist revolutions.

I didn’t think that I’d have to explain to somebody that the very existence of a hierarchy implies class structure.

And of course, there was no hierarchy in actual anarchist societies. /s.

Have you never heard of the concept of a transitional state? You know, that thing that socialists and anarchists both do, that involves hierarchy in repressing right wing elements? That socialists actually acknowledge the evil of, as opposed to pretending like they're not doing a transitional state?

Or do you have a new super special plan to do classless society day one? If so I'd love to hear it.

load more comments (128 replies)
load more comments (128 replies)
load more comments (130 replies)
load more comments (154 replies)